Licensed in California, Florida, Louisiana, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Texas, Washington, the District of Columbia, and before the USPTO.
© 2025 Lloyd & Mousilli. All rights reserved.


Windsor Law
University of Windsor

The rich text element

Ghallia is a rising 3L at Windsor Law in Windsor, Ontario. Prior to law school, she earned degrees in Biopsychology and Education from the University of Windsor. She is particularly passionate about corporate litigation and has a growing interest in the intersection between corporate law and human rights, especially within the realms of international human rights and education law.
Her previous experiences include student leadership, legal policy development, and advocacy for equity in educational institutions. Ghallia brings a strong research background and a detail-oriented approach to every file she touches.
In her spare time, she enjoys reading, writing, and exploring independent cafés. She is deeply committed to lifelong learning and hopes to use her legal career to bridge the gap between private-sector strategy and public-sector impact.
The rich text element allows you to create and format headings, paragraphs, blockquotes, images, and video all in one place instead of having to add and format them individually. Just double-click and easily create content.
A rich text element can be used with static or dynamic content. For static content, just drop it into any page and begin editing. For dynamic content, add a rich text field to any collection and then connect a rich text element to that field in the settings panel. Voila!
Headings, paragraphs, blockquotes, figures, images, and figure captions can all be styled after a class is added to the rich text element using the "When inside of" nested selector system.
Ghallia is a rising 3L at Windsor Law in Windsor, Ontario. Prior to law school, she earned degrees in Biopsychology and Education from the University of Windsor. She is particularly passionate about corporate litigation and has a growing interest in the intersection between corporate law and human rights, especially within the realms of international human rights and education law.
Her previous experiences include student leadership, legal policy development, and advocacy for equity in educational institutions. Ghallia brings a strong research background and a detail-oriented approach to every file she touches.
In her spare time, she enjoys reading, writing, and exploring independent cafés. She is deeply committed to lifelong learning and hopes to use her legal career to bridge the gap between private-sector strategy and public-sector impact.
It’s really nice to be back at Lloyd & Mousilli–this time stepping into the role of a summer law clerk. Having previously worked here as a legal assistant, the shift in responsibilities is noticeable, and I’m excited to grow into this new position. The energy feels different in the best way: more analytical, more strategic, and more hands-on with legal issues. The welcome from the team has been incredibly warm, which made the transition smooth, and I’m especially looking forward to being mentored by Chris Reel–fellow Canadian, which is a fun and familiar bonus. My first week kicks off with a rotation through the firm’s intellectual property group, working with Sam, Rachael, and Victoria. I’m excited to dive into the world of IP law and soak up as much knowledge as I can over the next ten weeks.
This week included onboarding meetings with Feras, Megan, and Allie, where we discussed a variety of projects I could potentially take on throughout the summer. One project that immediately stood out was the opportunity to create Arabic-language legal content–including a guide on patents, a 60-second explainer video, and a slide deck for a future presentation that Feras will be delivering. As someone who is passionate about accessibility in law and fluent in Arabic, this felt like a meaningful way to bridge both skill and purpose. During our conversations, I also shared that while I’m interested in all areas of corporate law, I definitely had my favourites–and the team was incredibly receptive and eager to align me with opportunities that match my interests. That kind of flexibility and attentiveness isn’t something you always see, and I really appreciate being placed in a position where I can grow in ways that feel both challenging and aligned with my long-term goals.
Working at a virtual law firm is a really interesting experience–it’s flexible, efficient, and in many ways, freeing. But, it can also feel isolating if you’re not intentional about connection. One thing I’ve learned is how important it is to actually take the time to get to know the people you’re working with. It doesn’t have to be anything big; even quick messages or check-ins go a long way. It makes the work feel more collaborative, and it helps you feel like you’re part of a team rather than just a name in a Slack notification.
That said, boundaries are key. When your workspace is also your living space, it becomes really easy to just… keep working. You start thinking about the next task before you’ve even finished the one in front of you. It’s not sustainable, and it usually leads to burnout or rushed work. What’s helped me is making sure I have things to look forward to outside of work–whether it's a hobby, a routine, or just unplugging for a bit. Virtual work can make it harder to “log off,” but stepping away is essential. Not only for your peace of mind, but also because your best work comes from a place of clarity, not pressure.
My second week at Lloyd & Mousilli was an exciting introduction into real-world trademark work that challenged both my legal research skills and my ability to communicate effectively in writing. From evaluating the defensibility of a client’s mark against a demand letter from a major brand, to contributing to a trademark search report, I had the opportunity to experience both the strategic and technical sides of intellectual property practice. These tasks gave me a better understanding of how trademark issues unfold in practice, and how lawyers are often called upon to advocate with nuance, precision, and a strong command of both law and language.
One of my first assignments was from Megan, who had me review a trademark demand letter issued by In-N-Out Burger. I conducted legal research into potential defenses under the Lanham Act and Texas law, focusing on likelihood of confusion, descriptive/fair use, dilution, and laches. I then prepared a bullet-point strategy memo along with follow-up factual questions for the client to help clarify the timeline and context of the alleged use. As a follow-up, Feras asked me to draft a response letter to In-N-Out Burger. It was a great opportunity to take my research and turn it into persuasive written advocacy—crafting a narrative that was both legally sound and client-ready.
While drafting the response, I received helpful feedback from both Sam and Chris. Sam encouraged me to focus on how the phrase “In-N-Out” is arguably descriptive of speed and efficiency, which opened the door to shift the comparison toward the more distinctive elements of our client’s mark—where the differences are much more pronounced. Chris helped me refine the tone and structure of my argument, offering insight that clarified how to frame the Pinterest v. Pintrips case as persuasive precedent. In that case, the court found that visual and phonetic similarities weren’t enough to prove actionable confusion, particularly given the descriptive nature of the shared term. That framing strengthened our argument that descriptive elements like “in” and “out” shouldn’t be monopolized absent strong secondary meaning.
Honestly, writing the letter was fun. It reminded me that a big part of being a lawyer is making well-supported “well, actually…” arguments—and showing up with receipts. It was a challenge to strike the right tone, but the process of building a legal position from research through to written product was incredibly rewarding.
Later in the week, I assisted Sam with a trademark search report by helping gather detailed information on potentially conflicting marks. Using the USPTO database, I looked up the serial numbers of similar marks that had been flagged and pulled the full goods and services descriptions, ownership information, and registration details for each one. I then compiled this data into a clear format and included hyperlinks to each record, making it easier to reference the original USPTO entries directly. It was a great hands-on exercise in navigating trademark databases and understanding how search reports are built—not just to identify conflicts, but to assess the actual scope and relevance of those conflicts based on the mark’s use, classification, and registrant. It was a more technical task, but it really emphasized how foundational precision and attention to detail are in IP work.
Reflecting on these experiences, my biggest takeaway is that good trademark work demands a balance between creativity and clarity. Whether you’re pushing back against a cease-and-desist or reviewing similar marks in a search report, your role is to tell a clear and persuasive story—supported by facts, legal standards, and a thoughtful tone. My advice to future clerks is to treat each assignment like a puzzle: take your time understanding the context, ask questions to fill in any blanks, and don’t be afraid to take a position—as long as you can back it up. You’ll learn quickly that IP law isn’t just about protecting rights; it’s about translating complexity into confident advocacy.
This week felt like a real mix of tasks that pushed me to think about how legal work actually meets the outside world. I spent time turning a technical outline about business wind down services into something that was informative but still approachable—something a potential client could read without feeling like they were being lectured. That kind of writing felt like a useful challenge: how do you take serious legal concepts and give them structure and voice without losing accuracy or sounding like you’re selling something?
The rest of the week balanced research and more behind-the-scenes support. From estimating trademark filing fees across jurisdictions to preparing evidence for litigation, I found myself switching gears a lot—one moment doing detailed legal research, the next organizing email chains into a coherent timeline. It reminded me how much of this work is about clarity and structure, even when no one’s going to see your name on the final product.
One of my assignments this week involved drafting a long-form website article on Lloyd & Mousilli’s business wind down services. I was given a detailed outline that covered everything from legal dissolution and IP asset disposition to ABCs (Assignments for the Benefit of Creditors), with the goal of turning it into a professional, web-friendly piece of thought leadership for the firm. My role was to take the technical substance and elevate it into a cohesive narrative that would resonate with prospective clients—serious in tone, but still clear and engaging.
The article needed to strike the right balance: informative without sounding like a legal memo, and marketing-savvy without losing credibility. I revised the provided content into a polished, structured piece that framed the firm’s wind down services as comprehensive, compassionate, and tech-savvy—while explaining complex topics like IP transfer and liquidation strategies in accessible language. It was a good exercise in translating legal nuance into client-facing content, and also in stepping into the firm’s voice to ensure brand consistency across different platforms.
I was asked to assist with researching international trademark filing costs and opposition procedures across several jurisdictions, including the US, UK, EU, and India. Specifically, I used the WIPO Madrid Protocol Fee Calculator to estimate the costs of filing a new application in India, based on the number of classes listed in the existing registration and the applicant’s country of origin. Since WIPO provides its estimates in Swiss Francs (CHF), I also converted the total to USD to create a more accessible cost breakdown for the client proposal. In parallel, I gathered filing fee information for an anticipated mark intended for use in all four jurisdictions and helped outline a standardized trademark search report pricing structure: a base fee with an added cost per region.
I also researched whether opposition proceedings in India are publicly accessible, which would allow the client to assess potential risks of conflict with existing domestic brands. I confirmed that opposition proceedings are searchable and that interested parties can monitor pending or contested applications. This information will help inform the client’s decision-making, particularly in industries where brand similarity could prompt formal challenges. Overall, this task enhanced my understanding of the procedural and cost considerations involved in multi-jurisdictional trademark filings and the importance of presenting that information clearly in client-facing proposals.
For this task, I assisted Chris with preparing evidentiary materials for a litigation case by converting email files into PDF format. The goal was to make the content easily accessible and properly formatted for review and potential submission. In addition to converting the email bodies themselves, I ensured that any PDF attachments included within those emails were saved, labeled, and organized alongside their corresponding converted messages.
Once all documents were converted, I compiled and sorted the files in a logical sequence to preserve the communication timeline and ensure clarity for the reviewing party. This task reinforced the importance of thoroughness and attention to detail when handling evidentiary documents, especially in litigation contexts where proper formatting and organization can significantly impact the efficiency and persuasiveness of a file.
What stood out to me this week is how much of the law is really about translation. You’re constantly moving between legal language, business context, and human understanding—and it’s your job to make sure nothing gets lost in that process. The strongest work wasn’t necessarily the most technical; it was the work that made things easier for someone else to understand, use, or rely on.
If I’ve learned anything so far, it’s that attention to tone and detail isn’t just about making things look good—it’s about building trust. And that kind of trust starts with small things: a well-organized file, a clearly worded sentence, or a thoughtful way of presenting information that helps someone make a decision with confidence.
This week gave me a solid mix of legal writing, practical cleanup, and creative work. I moved between drafting a motion for injunctive relief, filming an Arabic-English explainer video, and organizing a trademark spreadsheet for review. Each task required a different part of my skillset, but they all had one thing in common: making complex things easier for someone else to work with—whether that was a judge, a client, or the legal team.
I worked on a motion for preliminary injunctive relief with a focus on constructive trusts, and researched case law from the Third, Fifth, Sixth, and Eleventh Circuits. The goal was to back up our arguments around substantial likelihood of success, irreparable harm, and why a constructive trust would be appropriate. I used cases like Bleidt v. Lobato and Friedman v. Dollar Thrifty to support our position, especially in terms of traceable assets and equitable remedies. I drafted the motion based on that research and shaped the narrative to match the standards each circuit tends to follow. It was helpful to dig into how different courts frame equitable relief and apply those expectations to our own facts. After finishing the draft, I cleaned it up to make sure the argument flowed logically and was ready for use once the case moves forward.
I was asked to create a 60-second explainer video breaking down the patent-filing process. I wrote and recorded three scripts: one in English, one in formal Arabic, and one in conversational Levantine. The goal was to explain the difference between provisional and non-provisional filings, the importance of prior art searches, and key deadlines under the Paris Convention. After I filmed the first version, Megan let me know it needed a quick section added on PCT filings, so I updated the script and re-shot the video to include that piece. The final version hit the 59-second mark and is captioned in all three languages, ready for social media. It was a good test of how to translate legal content across different tones and audiences.
Rachel sent me a spreadsheet with flagged marks from a Markify “Introl” search that needed organizing. A lot of the entries included non-English characters—mostly Korean and Japanese—that made it harder for the team to quickly scan the list. I deleted the non-English text, so only the English translations were left, and then divided the entries by country within the spreadsheet. I also grouped and flagged duplicates so that everything was easier to review and export if needed. It wasn’t the most exciting task, but cleaning it up made a real difference in how fast the team can sort through potential conflicts.
Figure out how to make life easier for the person after you. Whether you’re drafting a motion, cleaning a spreadsheet, or writing a client-facing script, clarity always wins. Don’t get caught up in sounding smart—just focus on being clear and useful. Also, get things in early even if they’re rough. It’s easier to improve a messy draft than to scramble for something polished at the last minute. Finally, the “small” admin tasks matter more than they seem. The better you do them, the smoother everything else runs.
This week was defined by a mix of reflection, responsibility, and refinement. From engaging with firm leadership about my personal experience to participating in a firm-wide All Hands meeting, I was able to step back and understand how my role fits into the broader mission and values of the firm. I deepened my understanding of client-centered billing models and their connection to access to justice. I also encountered a valuable lesson in precision and attention to detail while drafting a client communication. Finally, I began drafting substantive amendments to a petition involving claims of conversion and fraudulent transfer, which pushed me to apply civil procedure, research, and legal writing skills in tandem. It was a week that underscored the importance of clarity, diligence, and understanding the real-world implications of the work we do.
Before this week’s All Hands meeting, I had the opportunity to meet with the firm’s leadership to discuss my experience as a summer clerk so far. It was a meaningful moment of professional reflection, and I appreciated how seriously the firm took the feedback process—even from interns. The All Hands meeting itself was a mandatory, firm-wide event where various teams presented updates, proposals, and strategic ideas. One presentation that stood out to me centered on the firm’s push toward offering more flat-fee legal services. The presenter argued that flat-fee structures not only benefit clients through financial predictability, but also increase access to justice by lowering the barrier to entry for legal services. It reframed billing as more than just a pricing mechanism—it’s also an ethical choice. I walked away from that discussion with a deeper understanding of how law firms can align business models with social values.
This week, I was assigned to draft a response to a client inquiry. I took great care to ensure the tone, content, and legal accuracy were appropriate. However, I learned a crucial lesson when I uploaded the draft to the team: I had forgotten to fill in a required date field. While I wasn’t the one who ultimately sent the response to the client, the omission highlighted the importance of reviewing every document with fresh eyes before submitting it, even internally. Legal communication—whether internal or client-facing—relies on precision and polish. That experience reminded me that even small mistakes can erode trust, and that meticulousness is a skill just as important as legal knowledge.
I also began work on drafting amendments to a civil petition to include claims for conversion and fraudulent transfer against newly identified entities. This task required revisiting the existing petition to identify the most logical places to incorporate the new causes of action, and to ensure that the factual narrative supported the legal claims being introduced. I also had to consider the procedural implications of amending a petition mid-litigation, and ensure that the revised pleading remained consistent in tone and structure. This kind of drafting work challenged me to synthesize legal theory with factual complexity and practice-oriented judgment. It was an excellent exercise in learning how legal documents evolve as a case progresses, and how critical it is to anticipate opposing counsel’s response while still maintaining clarity and credibility in our own pleadings.
Ask questions early, take your time, and don’t be afraid to triple-check your work. Even the smallest details can have meaningful consequences in legal practice. It’s easy to get caught up in finishing tasks quickly, especially when juggling multiple assignments—but excellence in this field often comes from careful, methodical work. Also, take advantage of opportunities to meet with leadership or attend firm-wide events. Understanding how the firm operates at a macro level will give you context for your micro-level tasks and help you see how your contributions fit into the bigger picture. Most importantly, remember that learning through mistakes is still learning—what matters most is how you integrate those lessons into your practice moving forward.
This week offered a valuable mix of litigation and transactional work, allowing me to engage with both client-facing communication and strategic legal drafting. I had the opportunity to contribute to a discovery motion, assist in preparing a flat-fee engagement letter, and help craft a formal response in a trademark-related dispute. Each task required a different set of skills—from legal research and procedural analysis to professional correspondence and document review—giving me a well-rounded perspective on the practical demands of legal practice.
I assisted with drafting a Motion to Compel in a discovery dispute. The matter involved opposing counsel’s failure to provide complete responses and improper boilerplate objections. I conducted legal research on Texas discovery rules and helped craft an argument emphasizing the insufficiency of general objections under Rule 193.2(a). I also reviewed relevant case law to support our position and contributed to revising the motion for clarity and compliance with procedural standards.
I reviewed a client-facing document prepared by one of the attorneys outlining a proposed flat-fee agreement and project scope. After reviewing the content and ensuring alignment with the client's objectives, I forwarded the correspondence to the client for approval. I also looped in a team member for further follow-up and coordination to move the project forward. This task helped me observe how legal service plans are communicated and confirmed in transactional contexts.
I helped prepare a response letter to opposing counsel concerning a claim of unauthorized trademark use on a client’s website. The issue involved a product that had previously been removed, but a residual link remained accessible through a third-party storefront. I worked on editing and polishing the client’s internal explanation into a formal response, ensuring it was legally sound, clear, and professional. This exercise reinforced the importance of precision in both digital content management and trademark enforcement communications.
This week emphasized how critical it is to balance technical accuracy with strategic tone, especially in written communications. Whether preparing a motion or responding to opposing counsel, I saw how wording choices can influence legal positioning and client relationships. I also learned the value of following up internally and externally to ensure alignment among the legal team, clients, and support staff. Overall, I’m continuing to develop a sharper eye for detail and a more confident voice in legal writing.