intellectual property

What is delta-8 THC?

Delta-8 THC is a cannabinoid found in cannabis. The natural quantities of delta-8 found in cannabis are pretty low, so to create usable amounts of it, it typically has be synthesized from hemp.

Is it Legal? Well...maybe.

*Marijuana* is a schedule I substance outlawed under the Controlled Substance Act, but the lower-thc cannabis plant – Hemp – was removed from Schedule I back in December 2018. Although Schedule I continues to list “tetrahydrocannabinols,” there is an exception listed for “tetrahydrocannabinols in hemp.” So delta-8 THC isn’t unlawful under the CSA.

Delta-8 THC also isn’t included in any FDA-approved pharmaceutical, so it doesn’t fall under the FDCA (Federal Food, Drugs, and Cosmetics Act) in the way that hemp-derived CBD does.

These were the arguments that attorney Dustin Kovacic made last year to overcome the USPTO’s initial CSA and FDCA Unlawful Use Refusals and convince them to register his client’s mark PLIFT. Although the goods identification does not specifically reference hemp-derived delta-8 (or hemp-derived delta-9 THC, also present in the actual goods), the specimen and record explicitly made it clear that the goods contained these items. Although applications for unlawful goods have absolutely been registered at the USPTO in the past by sneaking past the examiner their exact nature, that was absolutely not the case here. This mark registered in June 2024.

Attorney Andrea Steel found this registration and shared it on LinkedIn the other day, starting a whole conversation about whether this indicates a larger policy shift in the USPTO’s treatment of hemp-derived THC cannabinoid products. Although the USPTO hasn’t made any explicit policy statements on cannabis goods/services since a rather vague May 2019 Examination Guide on the subject, I know from my experience as a trademark examiner on the controlled substances work team at the USPTO from 2019-2021 that their internal policies absolutely have changed several times.

https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Exam%20Guide%201-19.pdf

For example, while the USPTO formerly accepted identifications of goods referring to “hemp,” identifications referring to hemp now generally have to include the chemical definition for clarifying purposes.

However, does this application really indicate a broader policy shift? There’s evidence indicating that that’s not the case.

There have been several applications to register trademarks with delta-8 THC goods identifications that have been pending at the USPTO unexamined for years. This sort of unofficial, unannounced suspension is something I’ve unfortunately noticed on several occasions when it comes to applications the USPTO doesn’t really want to deal with.

It does not appear that any applications which explicitly state delta-8 THC in the goods identification have been registered at the USPTO still, and the USPTO continues to ignore several of these applications entirely.

Affected applications include:

• LEAFY8NATURAL HEALING (with design) for a variety of hemp flowers and accessories, including “Hemp flower containing delta-8 tetrahydrocannabinol (delta-8THC) for use as a smoking herb.” Although this application was filed on Aug.05, 2021, it has yet to be examined by the USPTO over 3 years and 5 months later.
• VEGANCBD for a variety of cosmetic and beauty products, including “Cosmetic body care preparations, namely, skin care oil, massage oil, lotion, skin cream in liquid or solid form, hand cream, body cream, bath bombs, and/or lip balms; all of the foregoing with or without Nano (nanotechnology) and/or CBG (cannabigerol) and/orCBD (cannabidiol) containing goods derived from cannabis and/or hemp with aDelta 8 THC and/or Delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis.” It was filed Nov. 27, 2022 and has yet to be examined over 2 years and 1 month later.
• TWOROMANTIC for a variety of cigar and cigar accessories, including “Smokers' mouthpieces for cigars and cigarettes for use with or without cannibidiol (CBD) and other related Cannabinoids which include but is not limited to such as CBG, THCa,THC, THCv, Delta 8 THC, THVo, etc. all less than .3% Delta 9 THC/Delta 8 THC by dry weight basis.” Although this application was filed on May 30, 2023, it has yet to be examined by the USPTO over 1 year and 7 months later.
• SLAPZ for a variety of supplements and pharmaceutical preparations including  “Dietary and nutritional supplements containing delta-8 THC derived from hemp.” Although it was filed inMay 30, 2023, it still has yet to be examined by the USPTO over 1 year and 7 months later.
  

Those applications with Delta-8 THC identifications in them that have been examined, CSA or FDCA refusals continue to be issued.

• HI ON NATURE received CSA and FDCA Unlawful UseRefusals on Dec. 17, 2024, ~6 months after PLIFT registered in two applications– for a variety of goods/services including “Non-medicated lotions for skin and body which may contain delta-8 THC derived from hemp.”

What does this mean for the future of applications to register delta-8 THC and other hemp-derived cannabinoids at the USPTO?

It’s unclear. The USPTO’s policy on this continues to be arbitrary and inconsistent, but the approval of PLIFT indicates at least some hope that their approach to these apps may change soon.

The Intersection of SaaS and Patents: Protecting Your Software Innovation

Software-as-a-Service(SaaS) is a cloud computing service model in which access to software is often provided through a web application on a subscription basis. In this manner, the software, itself, is located on external or remote servers, rather than on servers located in-house. SaaS has become a dominant business model for major companies, enabling them to deliver their software products on a subscription basis rather than a one-time flat fee. This creates several advantages for the SaaS provider, by allowing the service provider to reach a broader range of clients as the entry cost is reduced. In addition, under a SaaS model, the long-term profit gains on a single piece of software has a higher ceiling, and the provider can send updates to the client and provide better control and support over their product without requiring an on-site technician or for the client to make a new purchase. As the SaaS market continues to grow, so too does the need for intellectual property protection. Patents can play a crucial role in safeguarding SaaS innovations and providing a competitive advantage.

Software Following the Wake of Alice

There is a common misconception that software and patents are incompatible with one another, or that obtaining a patent on a software-based invention is impossible following the landmark case of Alice Corp.v. CLS Bank Int’l, in which the Supreme Court decided “that the claims at issue are drawn to the abstract idea… and that merely requiring generic computer implementation fails to transform that abstract idea into a patent-eligible invention.”

The impact immediately following this case “led patent examiners to increase rejections based on patent-ineligible subject matter relative to all first office action decisions in affected technologies.” Consequently, this caused a shift away from inventors seeking to patent inventions that involve computers and software.  In an effort to provide some consistency in evaluating software-based invention, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has since issued the “2019 Revised Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance (2019 PEG), [which], had a much larger, statistically significant effect on examination uncertainty, particularly in Alice-affected technologies…. Showing that after one year, the 2019 PEG decreased uncertainty about patent subject matter eligibility determinations in the first action stage of patent examination by 44% for Alice-affected technologies.” This is good news for those in the software industry, particularly the SaaS space.

Understanding SaaS Patents

Obtaining a patent on a SaaS-based invention can be challenging due to the complex nature and distributed architecture commonly involved in these inventions.  In this manner, SaaS patents are often directed to the underlying technology or processes that enable the delivery of the software service to the end consumer. For example, a SaaS patent application can focus on the core processes or unique or novel steps which are performed, either in the cloud or on the client’s machine, to advance the technology and drive the SaaS application. In some cases, if the SaaS product provides a unique user interface or graphical model, a design patent may be applicable to cover any unique aesthetic features that the SaaS program provides, either to the consumer or other users.

Regardless of what portion of the SaaS model or aspect of the business that is trying to be protected, there is likely something that can be considered and analyzed for patentability. A good rule of thumb when deciding whether an invention is patentable, and particularly a SaaS invention, is to ask whether the service is merely taking a known idea and performing it on a computer, or whether the invention is entirely novel or adds some new advancement to the technology or field. Of course, it is best practice to check with a patent attorney who can walk you through the difficulties and nuances of patent law in order to ensure the invention is protected and granted the broadest possible protection.

While a patent may be right for many situations involving SaaS inventions, there may be certain specific instances where treating some portions of the model as a trade secret may be an alternative form of protection. Trade secret protection requires that specific steps are taken to maintain the secrecy and status of the invention as a trade secret. If this is something that seems to better suit the particular invention, check with an intellectual property attorney to ensure the required mitigating steps have been taken to maintain secrecy and legal protection.

Conclusion

Patents can provide significant protection for SaaS inventions, helping to secure market share, deter competition, and attract investors. By understanding the key considerations for SaaS patents and developing a strategic approach, you can maximize the value of your intellectual property and drive your business forward.

Lloyd & Mousilli boasts a team of experts in patent and intellectual property law. Let us employ our extensive experience helping early-stage innovators to receive the fullest patent protection over the novel idea at the earliest date to ensure priority. We have overseen patent strategies for consumer products at some of the largest technology companies and want to share this experience with you. The different teams at our firm, led by seasoned attorneys, work in synergy to help businesses seamlessly weave their patents throughout their broader business strategy. We will ensure that any equity agreements, assignment rights, employment agreements, non-disclosures and all other relevant documents accurately reflect the scope and rights regarding your innovations. Our goal at Lloyd & Mousilli  is to help clients accomplish their long-term goals by working closely with them a teach stage and tailoring our advice in accordance with the client’s aspirations and needs.

If you are in need of legal assistance, reach out and consult with the Lloyd & Mousilli startup legal team or set-up a free consultation through our website for questions about SaaS inventions and their patentability or any of your intellectual property or business legal needs.

The Importance of Trademark Monitoring

With the increasing complexity of global markets and the rapid pace of digital commerce, it is essential for businesses to monitor their trademarks proactively. Trademark monitoring not only helps businesses protect their brand from infringement, but it also enables them to maintain control over how their intellectual property is used. In this article, we’ll explore the significance of trademark monitoring, what it entails, and the potential consequences of neglecting it.

What is Trademark Monitoring?

Trademark monitoring is the practice of systematically tracking applications to register trademarks at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) that may resemble your own. It involves regularly reviewing the U.S. trademark register and other databases to check for unauthorized use of your mark. Monitoring services provide regular reports and alerts about newly filed trademark applications that potentially could infringe on your own rights.

While registering a trademark with the USPTO grants the owner exclusive rights to use the mark with the stated goods and services in the United States, it does not on its own prevent unauthorized usage in the marketplace. It is the brand owner’s responsibility to monitor and enforce that registration against others’ infringing uses and registration attempts. Trademark monitoring helps businesses identify possible conflicts, even when the infringement occurs far from the owner’s home markets.

Why is Trademark Monitoring Important?

1. Protecting Your Brand's Identity

A trademark represents the unique identity of your business. Whether it’s a logo, name, tagline, or design, your trademark sets you apart from competitors and ensures consumers can recognize your products or services. If your trademark is used without permission, it could lead to confusion among consumers, causing them to mistakenly associate an infringing product or service with your brand. Monitoring allows you to detect potential infringements early and protect the integrity of your brand.

2. Enhancing Legal Protection

Being able to show that you have actively monitored your trademark also shows that you have taken reasonable steps to protect your intellectual property. This evidence can strengthen your case in court if you need to enforce your trademark rights. It can also act as a deterrent to potential infringers, who may be less likely to infringe if they know that you are actively monitoring your trademark.

3. Detecting Counterfeiting and Fraud

Counterfeiting has become a serious issue for many businesses, particularly in the digital age where online marketplaces and global trade make it easier for counterfeiters to operate. A monitoring service can help detect the sale of counterfeit goods or services that use your trademark without permission. By identifying these fraudulent activities early, businesses can take action to remove counterfeit listings, prevent further sales, and protect consumers from being misled.

4. Expanding and Growing Your Brand

Trademark monitoring can also help identify geographical areas or industries where your trademark may be at risk. It can help you stay ahead of any potential conflicts or challenges to your brand’s presence in new markets. This allows you to act swiftly to protect your trademark rights as your business extends into new regions, products, or services.

What Can Happen if You Don't Actively Monitor Your Trademarks?

1. Dilution of Your Brand

Trademark dilution occurs when the strength of your brand is weakened by unauthorized use of a similar mark. If your trademark becomes associated with a wide range of goods or services, it could lose its unique association with your brand. This might result in a loss of customer loyalty, as well as decreased brand value. Monitoring your trademark helps prevent dilution and ensures that your mark remains strong and distinctive in the eyes of consumers.

2. Legal Consequences

Failure to monitor your trademark and take action against infringements can result in significant legal consequences. If you fail to protect your trademark, a court may determine that you abandoned your rights to it. Additionally, if you neglect to oppose similar trademarks in time, you may lose the ability to challenge these marks in the future. Regular monitoring ensures you stay ahead of potential threats and avoid inadvertently giving up your legal rights.

3. Loss of Revenue

Counterfeit goods or services can divert revenue from your business. Without monitoring, you might not even be aware that your products are being counterfeited, leading to lost profits.

4. Damage to Customer Trust

One of the most valuable assets for any brand is customer trust. If consumers are misled by similar marks or counterfeit goods, they may lose faith in your products or services. It could take years to rebuild that trust, and in some cases, irreparable damage could occur.

Conclusion

Trademark monitoring helps safeguard your brand, prevent confusion, and protect consumers from counterfeiting. Given the growing complexities of a globalized marketplace, there has never been a more critical time for businesses to prioritize trademark monitoring and protect what they’ve worked so hard to build.

To learn more about how Lloyd & Mousilli can help protect your brand, schedule a consultation us here.

The last thing any trademark holder wants to receive is a cease-and-desist letter from an attorney representing a brand that claims your mark is too similar to theirs. However, trademark holders can at least feel some relief that a number of these intimidating cease and desist letters are, in fact, fabricated shakedowns and not legitimate claims of trademark infringement.

All bark, no bite

Much like the USPTO impersonation emails discussed in Scam Series No.1, scammers have become quite adept at mimicking the formatting, letterheads, and even the writing style of law firms in these fake cease-and-desist letters. However, trademark holders can remain vigilant by evaluating the situation as follows:

1. Review the letter itself for obvious flaws.These could be spelling mistakes (more common than one might imagine),incomplete information about the supposed prior rights holder and their mark, or significant emphasis on urgency such as a 24-hour deadline.

2. Even if the letter seems to come from an attorney and legitimate firm, research both the attorney and the firm. Review any firm websites listed (e.g., the domain in the email address) for similar issues like typos, odd or missing information, AI-generated images, etc.Research the attorney who supposedly wrote the letter—look at their profile on the firm site and compare it to social media profiles like LinkedIn, reverse image search any headshots shown on the firm site, check the state bar to see if they’re actually listed in the state the letter claims they’re from, and see if any other information available online drastically differs from the information on the supposed firm’s site.

3. Like any other product or service, check reviews for botted or fraudulent ratings. Are the reviews totally 1-sided (all 5stars)? Were all the reviews submitted around the same time? Are the re-recurring phrases in a number of the reviews? Ask yourself questions about what makes a reviewer legitimate and how some reviews may fall short.

Again in the same vein as the USPTO impersonation scams, a trademark holder should bring any letter claiming infringement to their own attorney for evaluation. If all the signs point to the letter being a scam, either the victim or their attorney can report the incident to the state bar where the letter supposedly originates from, report the issue via an online form for internet crimes at www.ic3.gov, or contact the victim’s state attorney general.

Evolution of the Scam and USPTO's Response

This particular scam is the latest evolution in a series dating back to 2017, when a flood of trademark applications were filed at the USPTO with fraudulent specimens. Specimens, proof of the applicant’s use of a product or service in commerce, must be submitted before an application can proceed to registration. Bad actors would take an existing photograph of a product from online and digitally replace the existing trademark with the applied-for mark and submit that as a specimen. The USPTO feared that this practice could result in marks being registered that were not actually being used in commerce in the US, which could threaten the integrity of the US Trademark Register.

This led to a persistent game of Whac-a-Mole® between scammers and the USPTO, as the government implemented several security measures to try to defend against the fraudulent specimen issue, and then against other issues as they occurred. Nevertheless, new types of scams keep cropping up.

1. In August of 2019, the USPTO implemented the U.S. Counsel Rule, requiring any non-U.S. applicant to file via a U.S. attorney. The USPTO reasoned that since the fraudulent specimens were primarily coming from foreign applicants, this new requirement could potentially curb the issue.
2. Toward the end of 2019, the USPTO required a uspto.gov account to access trademark application forms. This provided more accountability as to who was actually filing the applications. While the fraudulent specimen issue reduced over time, the USPTO still found themselves dealing with hundreds or thousands of applications filed by trademark mills, companies full of non-attorneys who defrauded applicants into thinking they were being represented by competent counsel. These applications were often full of significant issues.
3. Eventually, attorneys had to start including their bar license numbers, state of registration, and year of licensure with trademark applications. This led to many bad actors reaching out to US attorneys via LinkedIn to ask if they could essentially “rent” their credentials in order to file massive numbers of applications.
4. In August of 2022, the USPTO began to require all uspto.gov users to verify their identity via id.me in order to file trademark forms. Support staff, such as legal assistants, paralegals, and law clerks, had to be sponsored by a verified attorney to access the filing system.In January of 2024, the id.me verification requirement was rolled out to cover support staff as well.

While these identity-verification methods may initially appear robust, the process of drafting an application itself leaves room for exploitation. When a filer reaches the “Attorney/Correspondence” section of an application, nothing actually prevents them from typing any name and bar number for the attorney. While examiners do check for attorney credentials during the application review process, this system is by no means infallible. The USPTO recently told ABA Journal that there have now been 30 documented cases of attorney names and credentials being listed on applications they did not file. One attorney, who has never practiced trademark law, had her name listed on over 2,300 applications!

These scammers impersonate U.S. attorneys in order to extract fees from unsuspecting clients and fraudulently file their trademark applications, but then disappear and allow the application to fall by the wayside. These scammers generally do not perform any sort of due diligence when filing the marks and the applications they file are often refused for some sort of deficiency or obvious conflicting mark. Applicants who expect to have an attorney who can handle such a refusal are then ghosted; these applications generally abandon due to failure to file a response. 

The victims here are two-fold: the clients who waste time and money investing in a doomed trademark application filed with fraudulent credentials, and the attorneys whose names are attached to these slapdash applications. 

Applicants seeking to avoid this situation should verify that their attorney is who they say they are. Make sure to check your attorney’s contact information online to ensure they are who they say they are. Be suspicious of unbelievably low filing fees for trademark applications; if it seems too good to be true, it often is. 

Attorneys should perform regular trademark searches for applications listing you as attorney by searching AT:(("FIRST NAME LAST NAME"~2) OR ("LAST NAME, FIRST NAME"~2)). If you see marks you don’t recognize, report the issue to [email protected].

Lloyd & Mousilli, a leading law firm specializing in intellectual property, technology and business law, is set to host a webinar titled "Don't Get Tricked: Unmasking the Most Common Trademark Scams," in collaboration with Alt Legal, a premier provider of IP docketing software. The event is scheduled for October 29, 2024, at 2:00 PM CT and will shed light on various fraudulent schemes targeting trademark applicants and their attorneys.

The webinar, sponsored by Alt Legal, aims to help participants recognize and navigate the increasing number of trademark scams, including fake email and phone solicitations that often deceive businesses and individuals seeking trademark protection. The discussion will focus on practical advice for avoiding these common pitfalls and the steps necessary to safeguard trademarks against such threats.

Topics Covered in "Don't Get Tricked: Unmasking the Most Common Trademark Scams"

• The sinister scams trademark attorneys and applicants are facing today
• Clues and red flags to watch for in email and phone solicitations
• Ways to protect your clients from falling into a scammer’s trap
• How to "exorcise" fraudulent uses of your credentials from the US Trademark Register

The Hosts

Rachael Dickson, Senior Trademark Counsel at Lloyd & Mousilli, will lead the presentation, drawing from her extensive experience in handling trademark law cases and protecting clients from fraudulent trademark practices. She will be joined by a panel of experts—Erik Pelton (Erik M. Pelton & Associates), Kayla Jimenez (US IP Attorneys), and Ana Vinueza (Commercial Counsel in Biotech)—who will share insights and best practices to equip trademark attorneys with the knowledge to protect themselves and their clients from fraud.

""While these types of trademark scams have existed for years, they've clearly gotten worse in recent months. Thousands of applications have been fraudulently filed at the USPTO using stolen attorney credentials! Applicants are also being constantly inundated with faux threats to their trademarks and faked invoices for unnecessary services. This event is designed to raise awareness of these scams and provide applicants and attorneys with the tools to spot and combat them," says Rachael Dickson.

Webinar Registration

To register for the event, visit https://www.bigmarker.com/alt-legal/Don-t-Get-Tricked. The webinar is recorded and all registrants will receive a link to the replay.

About Lloyd & Mousilli

Lloyd & Mousilli is a boutique law firm specializing in intellectual property, technology law and related litigation. From its founding over a decade ago, headquartered in Houston, Texas, Lloyd & Mousilli has championed the strategic use of intellectual property, counseling businesses from new startups to enterprises.

About Alt Legal

Alt Legal is an innovative IP docketing solution focused on making trademark professionals’ lives easier. Driving automation across all phases of the trademark lifecycle, Alt Legal has direct connections to the USPTO and CIPO and integrates other data to provide global trademark docketing coverage. Thousands of IP professionals benefit from their one-click reporting, smart email templates, personalized email reports, calendar sync, TEAS integration, collaboration tools, and Alt Legal Trademark Protection monitoring service.

Lloyd & Mousilli, Attorneys & Counselors at Law

[email protected]

For Immediate Release

Houston, TX - June 9, 2024 - There are countless trademark service providers available and seemingly attractive if further due diligence is not conducted. A quick search for “file trademark application” will yield sponsored advertisements for online providers aiming to provide a quick and easy, budget friendly experience for a “DIY” suite of trademark filings. Unfortunately, what is marketed is often not the best choice for a startup aiming to be optimized for long term growth and attractiveness to investors.

Strategic, attorney led trademark applications can still be an efficient process. Lloyd & Mousilli is a boutique law firm that specializes in intellectual property, technology law & related litigation. Managing Partner Feras Mousilli designed Lloyd & Mousilli's trademark practice with startups in mind.

How to Work with Us

1. Book a free intake call at lloydmousilli.com/calendar 
2. Provide details and context about your business
3. Electronic engagement letters and flat fee payments

Lloyd & Mousilli Trademark Team

Lloyd & Mousilli's trademark practice consists of experienced legal counsel with real world experience in startups and small business. While their resumes are stacked with prominent experience at companies like Apple and Dell, as well as the USPTO itself - deserving equal attention is that they are small business owners themselves. Trademark strategies for startups and small businesses are not the same as an enterprise approach and there is no one size fits all solution. Focusing on obtaining strategic protection in a cost effective manner sets the Lloyd & Mousilli team apart.

Trademark Services Provided

• Availability Searches
• US and International Trademark Applications
• Office Action Responses
• Trademark Oppositions
• Trademark Cancellations
• Trademark Licensing
• Trademark Sales
• Trademark Infringement Monitoring 
• Trademark Demand Letters
• Trademark Litigation

From the clearance search before your brand launches to enforcing your trademark registration in court - Lloyd & Mousilli specializes in supporting startups through the entire IP life cycle. 

About Lloyd & Mousilli

Lloyd & Mousilli is a boutique law firm specializing in intellectual property, technology law and related litigation. From its founding over a decade ago, headquartered in Houston, Texas, Lloyd & Mousilli has championed the strategic use of intellectual property, counseling businesses from new startups to enterprises.

Submission Requirements for the Standard Copyright Process

The U.S. Copyright Office requires submission of (1) a properly completed application (2) a nonrefundable filing fee and (3) a nonrefundable deposit. 

Requisites of a Properly Completed Application

• Completion of a profile with the eCO at eco.copyright.gov
• Initiation of a new application by or on behalf of the author of the copyrighted work, a copyright claimant, or an owner of one or more exclusive rights by clicking “Register Work” which will then require the: 
  • Identification of the type of work being registered.
  • Identification of the title of the work, together with any previous or alternative titles under which the work can be identified.
  • Identification of whether the work has been published. 
  • Identification of the work’s “author” and the copyright “claimant.” 
  • (if the work is derivative) identification of the new material and any preexisting materials that should be excluded from protection.
  • Identification of the mailing address where the certificate of registration should be delivered.‍

Required Filing Fee 

The filing fee for a standard application is $65 and may be paid online at pay.gov. 

Required Deposit of Work 

For the deposit of work, the applicant must submit the required number of copies or phonorecords of either the first published or the "best edition" of the work depending on the nature of the work.

What is “Special Handling”?

Special handling is a procedure for expediting the examination of an application to register a claim to copyright or the recordation of a document pertaining to copyright for an additional fee of $800 per claim. 

To request special handling, the applicant must state the reason for the expediency either online, in person, by courier, or by mail. The request may be made when the application or document is submitted to the U.S. Copyright Office or any time before the Office issues a certificate of registration or a certificate of recordation.

When requesting special handling for an application, the Office strongly encourages applicants to complete an online application and upload an electronic copy of the work if the work is eligible for submission in an electronic format. 

During the submission of an application by using the electronic registration system, the applicant may request special handling by completing the fields that appear on the Special Handling screen. 

Like, the standard copyright registration process, the request for special handling must then be certified by an author of the work, the claimant named in the application, an owner of one or more of the exclusive rights in the work, or a duly authorized agent of one of the aforementioned parties. The certifying party should then check the certification box to confirm the information provided in the request for special handling is correct.

When is “Special Handling” recommended”?

“Special Handling” is recommended generally when pending or prospective litigation exists, for custom matters, and when contract or publishing deadlines necessitate the expedited issuance of a certificate.

Once the request is approved, the Office will attempt to complete the examination within five working days followed by the issuance of a certificate of registration.

With this expediency, special handling has the power not only to accelerate copyright protection, but to safeguard your projected earnings, time, and intellect from competitors.

Scammers Posing as Government Agencies and Personnel

Trademark scammers often use official-sounding names and government data to trick you into believing they are affiliated with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“UPTSO”). Once your trademark application is filed, you may find yourself flooded with phone calls or texts from fake Trademark officials and official-looking offers and notices from private companies posing as government agencies. 

To avoid being scammed by these illegitimate agencies, be cautious of any solicitation from phone numbers you don’t recognize and entities like "Trademark Compliance Center" or "Patent and Trademark Bureau." These solicitations often contain accurate information about upcoming deadlines, but their true purpose is to deceive you into paying for their unnecessary services or fees.

The Trademark Renewal Trap

Another common scam involves offers to renew your trademark registration for an unreasonable fee. While it's true that trademarks must be periodically renewed to remain active, these scammers often send notices months or even years before the actual deadline. They may also charge fees that are much higher than the official USPTO renewal fees. 

If you have questions about whether the renewal notice is legitimate or a scam, check the USPTO database using your serial number for outgoing letters and contact your attorney if you are unsure of any upcoming deadlines, required actions or unexpected bills or fees. 

Phony Private Registries and Legal Services

In addition, trademark scammers may offer to record your trademark in a private registry but, these registries have no legal significance and provide no additional protection for your trademark. While companies offering legal services, like assistance with filings or responding to office actions, may be legitimate, they may also be fraudulent. Therefore, you must check to ensure the company is affiliated with a licensed U.S. attorney and has a valid bar number. 

Conclusion

To safeguard your trademark and avoid these trademark scams, always be cautious of unsolicited offers, notices and extra “required” payments. Remember that all official correspondence from the USPTO will come from the "United States Patent and Trademark Office" in Alexandria, Virginia and will normally come from an email (usually [email protected]).  All emails will be from the "@uspto.gov" domain. If you receive a suspicious offer, contact the USPTO’s Trademark Assistance Center directly at 800-786-9199 (press 1) or set up a consultation with Lloyd & Mousilli so that we can protect your intellectual property from falling prey to the hands of trademark scammers.  Remember, NEVER pay any money after your trademark application is filed until you check that it is legitimate.  

Why Conduct Trademark Searches?

The journey of getting a trademark registration for your brand seems straightforward—think of a name, design a unique logo or phrase, file a trademark application, and voila, your brand is protected. However, this simplified timeline overlooks the potential minefield of intellectual property rights that could send your business into costly legal battles and damage your brand's integrity. Conducting thorough trademark searches before filing can help you avoid these risks by ensuring your proposed trademark isn't infringing on existing rights. This due diligence is not just a precaution; it's an essential step in building a resilient brand identity.

The Pitfalls of Neglecting Trademark Searches

One of the primary reasons trademark applications are rejected by the US Patent and Trademark Office is because they are too similar to an already registered trademark. Identifying any similar trademarks before submitting your application can save your business time and money by ensuring your trademark does not infringe on the rights of another business.

Now imagine a worst-case-scenario where you launch a brand, invest in marketing, and establish a customer base only to receive a cease-and-desist letter for unintentional trademark infringement. The consequences can range from rebranding to compensation for damages—a scenario that could be financially and reputationally catastrophic. Thorough trademark searches act as a shield, protecting your venture from such threats.

Utilizing the Right Resources for Trademark Searches

If you can’t hire an experienced trademark attorney, you need to protect yourself by searching for similar trademarks yourself.  The effectiveness of your trademark search hinges on the resources you utilize. While many free tools offer basic search capabilities, they may not provide the comprehensive coverage necessary to uncover all potential conflicts. In your search, narrow your focus to trademarks that are confusingly similar to yours when used with goods and services that are the same as or related to yours. Here are some resources recommended for a thorough investigation:

1. United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Database: The USPTO's online database is a starting point for any trademark search. It allows you to search registered trademarks and pending applications, offering a glimpse into potential conflicts within the U.S.

2. Trademark Official Gazette (TMOG): The TMOG is a weekly publication by the USPTO that features all trademarks that received approval for registration in the USPTO database.

3. International Trademark Databases: If your business plans to expand globally, searching international databases like WIPO's Global Brand Database, the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) database, TMview, and Madrid Monitor is crucial.

4. The Internet: Common law rights are established once a business begins utilizing a trademark in intrastate commerce associated with specific goods or services. These rights are confined to the state  in which the trademark is used but can affect the rights provided by your trademark registration if another party’s common-law use predates the use supporting your application. Searching the internet for potential uses of your trademark or a similar trademark can prevent infringement of common law rights. 

5. Specialized Search Services: For a more thorough investigation, consider using specialized search services. These services can provide detailed reports on potential conflicts, including similarities in sound, appearance, and commercial impression, which might not be apparent through a basic search.  Be aware though, these commercial search services provide broad results, and many of the trademarks listed may actually not be a bar to your mark.  An experienced trademark attorney can help you parse the results.

Crafting a Legally Sound Trademark Strategy

A well-conducted trademark search is the foundation upon which a legally sound trademark strategy is built. This strategy should consider the distinctiveness of your trademark, potential market expansions, and the evolving landscape of intellectual property rights. Engaging with legal professionals who specialize in trademark law can provide valuable insights and guidance through this complex process. Lloyd & Mousilli and our unparalleled team of legal professionals with years of experience and deep expertise in trademark law stand ready to ensure your trademark is protected and legally complaint.

What is the USPTO's expedited review process?

The process of obtaining a trademark from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) can be complex and time-consuming. For applicants looking for a faster review process, the USPTO offers an expedited review option for trademark applications. It typically takes about 2 to 3 months from the time of filing (as opposed to the standard 8-12 months) to the issuance of a trademark registration, assuming there are no significant issues or objections.

‍

Eligibility requirements for expedited review

To take advantage of the expedited review process offered by the USPTO for trademark applications, you'll need to meet certain eligibility requirements. Generally, the expedited review option is available for applicants who can demonstrate a genuine need for expedited consideration. This may include situations where there is an imminent risk of trademark infringement or a need to enforce rights in court.

Additionally, applicants must meet other general requirements for registration, such as providing a complete and accurate application, meeting all statutory requirements, and paying the appropriate fees.

‍

How to apply for expedited review

In order to request an expedited examination for your application, you need to submit a Petition to Make Special to the USPTO after filing your application but before the commencement of the initial examination process. Your petition should include:

1. A comprehensive statement outlining the reasons why your application warrants special consideration.
2. Supporting facts indicating potential trademark infringement, legal disputes, or the necessity of U.S. registration to secure a foreign trademark.
3. Evidence demonstrating potential losses the applicant may incur if the application is not expedited.

‍

Things to consider before filing a petition to expedite your trademark

Deciding whether to file a Petition to Make Special should involve careful consideration and informed judgment. Points you should first consider include, but are not limited to:

• Financial resources necessary to cover the cost of the Petition
• Whether or not your evidence and circumstances justify expedited processing
• Whether or not there is ongoing litigation related to your trademark
• How long your trademark has been in use

‍

If you are unsure of your eligibility or need assistance with filing, Lloyd & Mousilli can advise you on the best course of action.

For immediate release

Houston, Texas - March 3, 2024- 

Lloyd & Mousilli has been ranked in Chambers USA Regional Spotlight Guide and recognized as a leading small to medium-sized law firm offering a credible alternative to Big Law.

Lloyd & Mousilli was selected based on an independent and in-depth market analysis, coupled with an assessment of its experience, expertise and caliber of talent. Lloyd & Mousilli was recognised for the strength of its work in Intellectual Property.

Managing Partner, Feras Mousilli, commented “From its inception, Lloyd & Mousilli has championed the strategic value of intellectual property as both a sword and shield for its clients. We are grateful to be recognized for the quality of work and unique expertise we bring to the table.”

Background to Firm

Lloyd & Mousilli is a boutique law firm specializing in intellectual property and technology law. From its founding over a decade ago, headquartered in Houston, Texas, Lloyd & Mousilli has championed the strategic use of intellectual property.

Lloyd & Mousilli intentionally developed a team of subject matter experts to lead its intellectual property practice groups. This expertise is demonstrated through:

• 25 years of experience as a trademark examining attorney with the USPTO;
• Board certification in intellectual property law with almost two decades of exclusive patent prosecution practice;
• Niche expertise in technology licensing;
• In house counsel for enterprises such as Apple, Dell and Dolby Laboratories;  and 
• Fulbright Specialists in intellectual property and technology commercialization.  

Intellectual property counsel at Lloyd & Mousilli earn their seats at each clients’ table. For more information, please visit lloydmousilli.com. 

Background to Chambers and Partners

Chambers and Partners has over 30 years of US research in the Legal Market and is therefore uniquely placed to identify markets where there are a significant collection of leading smaller firms. Chambers is on a mission to uncover the best legal talent wherever it may be, starting with shining a spotlight on Texas.

The state of Texas, home to five of the top fifteen US cities by population, is a thriving market with a number of distinct and growing legal centers. 

Through Regional Spotlight Texas 2024, Chambers and Partners has continued to delve into the rich seam of talent on offer,  building on their existing list of the top small firms in Texas that can effectively and efficiently meet in-house counsel needs.

‍

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998

The federal government implemented the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 (“DMCA”) to protect those that use copyrighted material in a digital format. This provides significant liability protection for those who host interactive online media.

‍Service Providers 

“Service providers” are especially vulnerable to infringement. The DMCA defines a service provider as “an entity offering the transmission, routing, or providing of connections for digital online communications, between or among points specified by a user, of material of the user’s choosing, without modification to the content of the material as sent or received” and “a provider of online services or network access, or the operator of facilities therefore.”

Safe Harbor Protection

Unfortunately, copyright infringement is still valid even if you did not know the work was copyrighted. This is because the DMCA highlights this exact problem, and the responsibility of obtaining Safe Harbor protection is solely on the owner of the platform. It is especially important to apply for this protection if you do not know if your website has copyrighted material.

The DMCA protects work that is primarily displayed by service providers, which means your platform could be at risk for infringement without this protection. Copyrighted material on a website can include stock images, music, photography and others of the like. 

The good news is that applying for Safe Harbor protection is quite simple. To achieve this, you’ll need to create a DMCA Designated Agent account and assign a registered agent. A registered agent can be anyone of your choosing, so once you’ve selected an agent, you can click on the following link to set up an account: https://dmca.copyright.gov/osp/p1.html. Once registered, your platform is immediately covered under Safe Harbor protection. This is an easy step to take to prevent an infringement headache waiting to happen. 

Having trouble with copyright infringement?

Schedule a free consultation with Lloyd & Mousilli to discuss how to avoid committing infringement as well as how to protect yourself from infringers.

Your business name is not just a label; it's the beacon of your brand's identity, guiding consumers to the unique products and services you provide. In the entrepreneurial journey within the United States, where your brand essence is crucial to your market presence, the protection of your name isn't just an option—it's essential.

However, the formation of an LLC, just like a Corporation or Sole Proprietorship, while providing a foundation for your business structure, does not automatically shield your name from potential infringement.

Without robust intellectual property safeguards, your cherished business name remains exposed to risks that could undermine your brand and reputation, or even lead to a costly lawsuit.

No, an LLC doesn't protect your business name, and neither does a C-corp, S-corp or sole proprietorship. But trademark registration does. Read on to find out how your business name can be protected from legal risk and what you can do about it—starting today.

Your business name is not just a label; it's the beacon of your brand's identity, guiding consumers to the unique products and services you provide. In the entrepreneurial journey within the United States, where your brand essence is crucial to your market presence, the protection of your name isn't just an option—it's essential.

However, the formation of an LLC, just like a Corporation or Sole Proprietorship, while providing a foundation for your business structure, does not automatically shield your name from potential infringement.

Without robust intellectual property safeguards, your cherished business name remains exposed to risks that could undermine your brand and reputation, or even lead to a costly lawsuit.

Trademark protection is vital for business owners seeking to secure their brand identity against infringement, as LLCs and other legal entities do not offer this safeguard inherently. For entrepreneurs considering forming a business entity, understanding the trademark process and consulting with a trademark law firm for legal advice can greatly enhance their assets' security and ensure comprehensive brand protection.

What Is an LLC?

An LLC, or Limited Liability Company, offers a blend of flexibility and protection, shielding owners from personal liability for business debts and offering favorable tax treatments, much like other corporation structures but with distinct advantages.

While essential, forming an LLC through filing a Certificate of Formation with your Secretary of State is merely the first step. Here at Lloyd & Mousilli, we dive deeper, preparing all vital corporate documents to ensure your business is a well-constructed fortress from the start.

Trademark protection is essential for any business, regardless of its structure, to safeguard its valuable assets and branding. Understanding the intricacies of trademark rights and the implications of trademark infringement is crucial for entrepreneurs and LLC owners looking to effectively shield themselves from potential legal challenges and liabilities.

How do I protect my brand name in the USA?

But what about protecting the very essence of your identity—the name of your LLC, or your product or service? This is where trademarking, guided by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), shines as your safeguard. Registering your business name as a trademark solidifies your claim over it, marking it as uniquely yours in the commercial arena.

A trademark not only includes the name of your LLC, but it also extends to the logo that represents your brand, ensuring you have exclusive rights to it. For many entrepreneurs, securing federal trademark protection through the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) can be a crucial step in safeguarding their legal name and preventing other companies from infringing on their ownership rights.

What is a trademark and how is it important to my LLC?

A trademark is a word, phrase, symbol, and/or design that distinguishes one company's products and services from a competitor. Trademarking empowers you to take decisive legal action against any misuse of your brand name, preserving the integrity of your brand.

A trademark is more than just legal protection; it is a declaration of your brand's uniqueness, differentiating your offerings from competitors', enforced by the stringent laws of the United States.

A trademark serves as a vital tool for new business owners, offering important legal reasons to protect their chosen business name and brand identity. By filing trademark applications with the US Patent and Trademark Office and conducting a comprehensive trademark search, small businesses can significantly lower the risk of litigation and safeguard their interests against competitors who may attempt to steal their business money or reputation.

How do I register an LLC trademark?

With Lloyd & Mousilli's expertise in intellectual property, we guide you through the nuances of trademark registration with the USPTO, ensuring your business name commands the respect and recognition it deserves within your industry.

Our specialized team is ready to navigate you through the intricacies of trademark application. From identifying the appropriate goods and services class to crafting a comprehensive trademark strategy, our hands-on approach simplifies the process, giving you peace of mind and more time to focus on what you do best—growing your business.

By partnering with us, you ensure that your trademarks are legally secured, providing you and your limited liability company (LLC) with the necessary legal entity protections. Our approach not only clarifies whether an LLC can shield its owners from bankruptcies and lawsuits but also prepares you to combat scenarios where a business steals your intellectual property rights.

In short, Does an LLC Protect Your Business Name?

No. Granted, forming an LLC does offer a solid foundation for protecting your business identity. The structure of an LLC shields personal assets in legal situations. It also clearly separates the organization from its owners in the eyes of the law. However, forming an LLC alone does not guarantee automatic protection for your trademark or business name. To ensure your business name is fully safeguarded, you must undertake trademark registration at state or, ideally, federal levels for nationwide protection against infringement.

Advantages of an LLC for Business Protection

Forming an LLC protects your business in many ways:

1. Liability Protection: Unlike a sole proprietorship, an LLC offers liability protection. It separates personal assets from business liabilities. This legal structure positions you as the clear legal owner of the business name, essential for sustaining a robust brand identity.
2. Enhanced Credibility: An LLC enhances credibility with clients and partners. This provides a layer of legitimacy and safety. Such a structure is especially beneficial in competitive markets, indicating a formal commitment to business operations and reputation management.

The Risks of Neglecting LLC Name Protection

Without appropriate steps to protect your LLC name, you may encounter legal challenges and brand recognition issues. Competitors might register similar names, potentially compromising your unique market identity and leading to disputes. Proactive methods like securing patents and trademark registration are vital for maintaining your LLC's distinctive character and preventing conflicts.

Key Steps to Protect Your Business Name

1. State-Specific Registration: Registering your business name as part of your LLC formation establishes your rightful ownership and deters potential infringements. This is crucial in maintaining brand integrity.
2. Diligent Monitoring: Pay attention how your business name is used in the marketplace to catch any unauthorized use early. Prompt action against infringements helps maintain your brand’s integrity.
3. Understanding Trademark Protection: Acknowledge that LLC formation is just one step. Comprehensive brand protection requires a trademark strategy to fully secure your business name against misuse.

Conclusion: LLCs and Business Name Protection

In summary, LLCs don't automatically secure your company name against competition or misuse. The power's in your hands to protect it. And how do you do it? Actively managing your brand, applying for trademark registration, and complying with relevant legal requirements. Only through these efforts can you realize the full benefits of an LLC in protecting your business name. That's the sure way to reap the rewards of long-term brand credibility and market position.

How Can Lloyd & Mousilli Help with My LLC?

Take the first step in fortifying your brand's legacy. Schedule a free consultation with a Lloyd & Mousilli expert today. Or, if you're ready to propel your trademark journey forward, our straightforward trademark intake form awaits your key details to kickstart the process.

Let Lloyd & Mousilli be your companion in transforming your brand from vulnerable to invincible. Your business name, whether tied to an LLC, Corporation, or Sole Proprietorship, is the cornerstone of your identity. Protect it with the vigilance it deserves, under the vigilant eyes of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

What is the Metaverse?

The metaverse is essentially an immersive experience that integrates the virtual world and reality, allowing users to interact with one another even if they are not physically in the same space. People can work, shop, and socialize in the metaverse the same way they do in real life. This inevitably translates to a digital economy; users can sell and purchase virtual products, like clothes and real estate, that only exist in the metaverse. 

‍Who is trademarking in the Metaverse?

Major brands are preparing to enter the metaverse by trademarking their logos and products. 

• Nike has filed seven trademark applications with the USPTO in which the company indicated its intent to make and sell virtual apparel. 
• CVS Health filed to trademark its pharmacy and health clinics with the USPTO, intending to patent sales of virtual goods like wellness and beauty products, prescription drugs, and non-emergency medical services.
• Walmart has filed several trademarks that indicate its intent to market virtual goods. In a separate filing, Walmart specified that it would offer customers NFTs and a virtual currency. 
• Most notably, Facebook has dedicated itself to total immersion in the metaverse. Last year, the company officially changed its name to Meta. 

‍Why are trademarks in the Metaverse important?

Your intellectual property is valuable and should be protected- both physically and virtually. Creators are already taking advantage of the unprecedented circumstances created by the introduction of the metaverse. For example, third-parties filed two trademark applications last year to use Prada and Gucci logos on “downloadable virtual goods” on metaverse platforms. The third parties are unaffiliated with the real Prada and Gucci, but their attempt to capitalize on  major brands in the metaverse marketplace is an indication of what is to come.

 Shielding your brand’s name and image in the virtual world is crucial. Lloyd & Mousilli can guide you through the complexities of obtaining a trademark for use in the metaverse to ensure you are afforded the protection your brand is entitled to. 

‍What protections does a trademark in the Metaverse offer?

Fraudulent use of your intellectual property by unaffiliated third parties can be detrimental to your brand’s image. The last thing you want is your customers being exposed to confusingly similar products being sold by infringers. A trademark will legally protect your brand in the event that your products or intellectual property are infringed upon. Even if your brand has already obtained trademark registrations for the “real world,” you should consider filing separate applications for those existing trademarks that cover distinct virtual goods and services. This will ensure that such rights are recognized and protected in the metaverse virtual marketplace. 

‍How are trademarks in the Metaverse enforced?

The first course of action to enforce a trademark is typically to send a cease and desist letter to the infringer. If this is unsuccessful in stopping the infringement, the next step is to file a lawsuit. Trademarking in the metaverse is a relatively new concept so it is still too early to say exactly how trademark enforcement in the virtual world will unfold, but the general process of stopping an infringer will be the same. Lloyd & Mousilli is prepared to preserve the integrity of your brand by counseling you in the event of trademark infringement.

You Want In: Where Do You Start?

Filing a trademark application for your brand is the first step. Lloyd & Mousilli's trademark attorneys understand the complexities of intellectual property, as well as the intersection of technology and law. Book a consultation to discuss more in depth about the trademark process as it pertains to the metaverse.

‍

‍

‍

Why are Examiner Interviews beneficial?

Examiner interviews are the not-so-secret weapons of patent prosecution. If conducted strategically, an interview with your patent examiner can potentially be the driving force that leads to a successful registration. 

An examiner interview can provide several benefits, including: 

_{‍Clarification}

Examiners are only human; misunderstandings in the written communication between the examiner and the applicant can often be clarified with a face-to-face discussion. Your conversation may unearth information you otherwise would not have obtained. For example, your examiner may have misunderstood your claim as you’ve written them. A verbal explanation may provide the necessary clarity that the examiner was missing. 

_{‍Cost and time reduction}

On average, each Office Action response costs about $3,000. An interview with the examiner can potentially reduce the number of refusals issued against your application, saving you money and cutting down the prosecution time. 

‍When and how can you request an interview?

Once a first refusal has been issued, patent applicants are entitled to an interview with their examiner. There are three ways to submit a request for an interview: 

(1) Fill out a PTOL-413A form 

(2) The USPTO’s online Automated Interview Request (AIR) system

(3) Call your examiner directly to request an interview

‍Tips for a successful interview:

Simply attending the interview isn’t enough; preparation is key. Some ways to prepare for your interview are:

_{‍Prepare an itinerary}

Come prepared. Examiner interviews are typically 30 minutes long - make the most of your time by being as concise and efficient as possible. Prepare an itinerary for your discussion, including all questions and arguments you have for the examiner.

_{‍Ask for input}

An interview allows you to directly request the examiner’s recommendations for improving the claims in your application. For example, making note of the claim language the examiner uses is a strategic way to improve your arguments; they are not likely to reject their own language, so take advantage of this opportunity to receive their direct input. 

‍Ready to take the plunge on a patent application?

Patent applications are tedious and complex. It can take the average person months to learn the ins and outs of patent prosecution. Applying on your own is always a risk, as one small mistake can lead to drastic consequences regarding cost and time delays. 

Lloyd & Mousilli has dedicated intellectual property attorneys who are experienced in the patent application process. We can assist with the preparation and filing of your application, as well as offer strategic guidance on your overall intellectual property protection. 

‍

La Dart’s official complaint is largely predicated on her assertion that the stylistic elements of her book are not typical, and that they are not present within other published works. Therefore, she alleges that there is a substantially similar overall impression of the two works that constitutes infringement. 

In order to prove her allegations, La Dart has the burden of proving two elements:

1. She owns a valid copyright 
2. Swift copied constituent elements of La Dart’s original work

La Dart’s complaint establishes that she obtained a valid copyright registration for her book in 2010. The more difficult element to prove is the second, as it relies on La Dart using circumstantial evidence to support her claims. 

For example, La Dart’s complaint asserts that Swift had “repeated and long-term access” to her book “Lover“ as it was available through various channels after its publication. If she is unable to provide evidence that the work was actually accessed, she must show that there is a “striking similarity” between her work and Swift’s.

La Dart claims that Swift’s album and accompanying book contain a “substantially similar” format, color scheme, and design. The identical titles, of course, are also at issue. The complaint also alleges that the photographs of the two women on the covers of their respective books are similar enough to warrant infringement, as they are each shown in an “upward pose.” 

An additional element often used to prove copyright infringement is that the defendant sought commercial advantage or private financial gain. While La Dart’s complaint does not explicitly accuse Swift of such, it certainly implies it by referring to the considerable number of sales and subsequent monetary gains of Swift’s Lover album.

The complaint, filed on August 23rd, 2022, declares that La Dart has been irreparably harmed by Swift’s album. She is seeking $1 million in damages, as well as Swift’s profits attributable to the infringement. At the time of this publication, there were currently no substantive updates on the case.

‍

‍

‍What is Injunctive Relief?

Injunctive Relief is a court-ordered act or prohibition against an act that has been requested in a petition to the court for an injunction. Usually, injunctive relief is granted only after a hearing at which both sides have an opportunity to present testimony and legal arguments (NOLO, n.d.).

What is a Temporary Restraining Order?

A Temporary Restraining Order is a court order that prevents someone from committing a certain action endorsed by the court. This type of order has a specified time limit and does not exceed 14 days, unless the court sets a time before that date. 

‍What is a Permanent Injunction?‍

A Permanent Injunction is a court order that a person or entity take certain actions or refrain from certain activities. A permanent injunction is typically issued once a lawsuit over the underlying activity is resolved, as distinguished from a preliminary injunction, which is issued while the lawsuit is pending (NOLO, n.d.). Injunctions are decisions made by the court commanding or preventing a specific act. This is useful in Intellectual Property disputes when parties are arguing over ideas and intellectual rights owned by one of the parties.

When there is a patent, copyright, or trademark owned by a party, that party can prove to the court that they own that property protected by the law. With this document stating they own the rights to the specific property, they are able to request a permanent injunction from the court to prevent another party from using their property.

For example, if you owned a trademark for the company name “Amazing Star”, and you noticed that a store opened with the name “Amazing Star” across the street from your business then they would be infringing on your entity’s trademark. In order to receive injunctive relief from the court, you will need to provide the trademark declaration to the court for proof of ownership. 

What does a Business need to prove to get a preliminary injunction awarded?

First, you must decide if your case should be heard in State or Federal Court. This can be deciphered by determining the questions or diversity involved in your case. Inter-state issues should be filed in Federal Court, whereas issues that are within state jurisdictions should be filed in state courts. 

Once you have decided if the case should be filed in State or Federal Court, it would be beneficial to decide which court you would like to petition to hear the case. This is a crucial step to ensure that the judge you decide to request a hearing from is willing to hear – and potentially grant your case. 

How Do I Request an Injunction?

Prepare Your Complaint

To begin your request to the court, you would likely want to start with the complaint. This is beneficial to the judge overseeing the case because it will give the judge an idea of what to expect during the hearings and the duration of the trial. You should be as descriptive as possible in your complaint, but not excessive. This complaint will be attached to the petition that is filed with the court. 

Review Applicable Rules

Before you submit your petition to the court, you want to ensure that you have reviewed the local rules of the court. This will help to have a better understanding of how the process would go moving forward in the case. Most courts post their local rules on their respective websites. These rules are usually issued by the presiding judge and abided by their associates. 

Proceed with Filing

Once you have reviewed all the facts needed and verified that you have included all necessary points, you can proceed with filing with the court. After reviewing all the rules associated with the court, you can adjust accordingly for a likely outcome. (American Bar Association, n.d.).

A Preliminary Injunctive Relief can benefit the Plaintiff in an Intellectual Property Dispute by bringing the seriousness of the damages to the court’s attention. This is most useful when there are other parties involved that seek to steal or misuse property that would otherwise cause the Plaintiff’s company harm. A Preliminary Injunction MUST show that the Plaintiff will suffer irreparable harm unless the injunction is granted. 

If your request for a preliminary injunction is denied by the court, and sufficient evidence has been provided, the party requesting the preliminary injunction may file and interlocutory appeal (an appeal that occurs before the trial court’s final ruling on the entire case). There are three reasons that must be met in order to complete an interlocutory appeal. First, the order must have conclusively determined the disputed question. Second, the order must “resolve an issue completely separate from the merits of the action. Finally, the order must be “effectively unreviewable on appeal from a final judgment.” (Cornell Law School, n.d.)

Lloyd & Mousilli Can Help

This may seem like a lot of information, but there are resources out there to help with the questions you have. Selecting the best attorney that suits your needs and has the experience you need to get this case through is a hard task. At Lloyd & Mousilli, we are here to help get you through the difficult times and strive to get you the best outcome for you and your company. L&M offers a free 15-minute consultation to answer your questions about this topic.

‍

What is a Trademark?‍

While driving down the road, you might recognize that a McDonald’s is approaching your line of sight by identifying the infamous “golden arches” at the forefront of your dashboard. With this iconic symbol pinned at nearly every intersection, it is difficult not to recognize the fact that McDonald’s has some pretty serious brand establishment. 
‍

It is no easy feat to accomplish this type of remunerative stature, however, the process of protecting a brand’s identity is a great way to start. Submitting a trademark application is one of the first things a business can do to establish an economic profile and jump start a brand’s identity. 

The word “trademark” can refer to both trademarks and service marks. The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) defines a trademark as a word, phrase, symbol, design or a combination of any of the aforementioned that defines goods or services. This is how consumers are likely able to identify a brand from other potential competitors and can also protect a business from its economic rivalries. 

With that said, any business entity or individual can apply for a trademark. It is an essential part of protecting a company’s intellectual property and can emphasize the marketability of a business.

Filing a Trademark Application

During the process of filing a trademark application, the mark will be evaluated as to whether it is registrable, and how difficult it will be to protect. After this has been determined, the application will be submitted to the USPTO for review and approval. 

From this point forward, the proposed mark will live in the Trademark Electronic Search System (TESS) while awaiting review. TESS is a trademark database that allows anyone in the world to search for trademarks that have been registered or applied for in the United States. This platform is used to show the public what trademarks are currently awaiting registration, and which of those already have a registered status. This also give entities a closer look into the current climate of what companies are looking to register as their own mark. 

Such as any publicly searchable database, TESS provides a great deal of public exposure to pending trademark applications, which can be a huge topic of concern for high-profile companies. Big fish brands have to go through the same process of filing a trademark application just like any other business, so a considerable amount of time, strategy and analysis goes into selecting the best course of action for submitting a trademark.‍

Concealing a Trademark Application ‍

Recently, companies have gotten more sophisticated with how they approach submitting their trademark applications. With society’s ever-growing concern for the next big product, it has become harder and harder for brands to mask their newest creations inside the world of the internet, thus requiring concealment. The most recent example of a successful trademark concealment can be found in Apple’s latest addition to their tech roster, the iPhone 14.

September 16, 2022 marked the release of the new and improved iPhone 14, with some pretty distinctive upgrades. Most notably, what was once was a thick black indent on the top of the screen is now an interactive touch bar titled the Dynamic Island. This new upgrade allows the user to engage with the screen in a multitude of variations that are not privy to older iPhone generations. 

Apple is no stranger to trademarks, so it can be assumed that their strategy on filing certain trademark applications is razor sharp. The submission of the Dynamic Island trademark was kept well under wraps without an inkling of potential for pre-exposure, and many ask how this was possible given the highly anticipated launch of the tech giant’s newest addition to the iPhone dynasty. 
‍

This concept of concealing trademark applications to prevent pre-exposure has become an increasingly used tactic amongst many big named brands. TESLA is another example of a very established company that utilizes this tactic to conceal their latest and greatest trademark. Other companies use this approach to prevent competitors from searching for technology gold.

With that, there are certain strategies you can implement into a trademark application to prevent the general public from viewing and potentially replicating a mark. Trademark concealment is most commonly utilized when a brand wants anonymity during the process of waiting for a trademark registration, which has consistently been met with success. This is accompanied by using foreign priority rights to keep the trademark filing a secret. 
‍

What is Section 44(d)?

‍
Section 44(d) of the Trademark Act has allowed companies to jump over the hurdle of having their trademark applications displayed in the Trademark Electronic Search System by filing their trademark application in a foreign country such as Jamaica, or in any other country that does not have an online database viewable to the public. If someone wanted to view the recent trademark applications in Jamaica, they would need to go the physical Jamaican trademark office. This provides an extra layer of effort and determination for scouters to cross through in attempting to leak a mark. 
‍

Now, subject to scrutiny and public opinion, this loophole does not have a very long shelf-life. If a company intends on having their mark registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, it is required that trademark applicants file with the U.S. claiming priority to the trademark within 6-months of filing the foreign application. Given the fact that the majority of brands use this tactic to prepare for the release of major products, the concern of the concealment lifespan is marginal to most. 
‍

Section 44(d) gives companies practically 6-months of secrecy to prepare for any necessary actions before the trademark is officially released as public record in the U.S. Whether that be a media event or a soft social media launch, it is imperative to a business that their secrets remain well hidden- and rightfully so. 
‍

Conclusion ‍

This is an extremely useful way for brands to maintain the integrity of their most prized trademark applications, and a beneficial tool to utilize when there is concern over competitor poaching. If this alternative did not exist, some of our most beloved products might not be what they are today. 

The protection of your trademark is one of Lloyd & Mousilli’s highest priorities. Our seasoned legal counselors can provide you with the necessary tools required to file a successful trademark application and maintain the integrity of your intellectual property.

Brand Protection in E-Commerce and Your Amazon Store

In the e-commerce space, especially on Amazon's hyper-competitive marketplace, the available options are limitless for the consumer. There are endless amounts of products available from anywhere at any time, which is why brand identity is critical to stand out.

Considering the tremendous amount of e-commerce companies and Amazon sellers, there is always the possibility of infringement. This is why it is important that the consumer knows exactly who they are purchasing from.

What is the Amazon Brand Registry?

The Amazon Brand Registry is a program that assists brand owners in protecting their intellectual property on Amazon. The most pertinent feature in this context is its Project Zero Program. Once infringement is proven, the program allows you to blacklist those infringing users.

The competitiveness of Amazon.com is why establishing a distinguished brand identity among legions of sellers is more crucial than ever. As an Amazon Brand Registry member, achieving standout brand recognition and brand awareness not only enriches the shopping experience but also fortifies your defense against patent infringements. This ensures that your brand can navigate the complexities of Amazon with confidence, preserving a strong reputation.

Joining the Amazon Brand Registry brings a wealth of benefits, crucial among them enhanced brand protection and heightened brand awareness among customers. Utilizing the tools Amazon provides, such as Brand Registry accounts and the Amazon Vine program, you can markedly advance your brand-building and make your customer journey more memorable -- with sound legal protection.

Why is Amazon's Brand Registry important?

A popular seller on Amazon is bound to attract infringing parties who seek to capitalize on that brand’s reputation and loyal customer base. The infringing party may produce subpar products and deliver poor customer service. This can result in financial loss and a damaged reputation for the true brand. A trademark registration, however, gives the Amazon seller recourse to take action against the infringing party.

Establishing a trusted brand that customers will return to is key, and the first step is to ensure that your brand identity is protected by a trademark registration. This will safeguard both your brand’s identity as well as your customers from infringing parties. Joining Amazon's Brand Registry gives you the ability to report those infringing listings to keep your brand safe, and your customers satisfied.

For active Amazon sellers, it's key to meticulously manage your brand identity with robust brand protections, especially through trademark registration. By engaging in the Brand Registry program and integrating with the available ecommerce software solutions to protect your reputation and monitor your IP, you empower your Amazon business amplifies brand presence and significantly refine the customer experience.

How do I create a Brand Registry Account?

To be listed on the registry, your brand must have an active, registered trademark through one of the following government trademark offices:

• United States
• Brazil
• Canada
• Mexico
• Australia
• India
• Japan
• France
• Germany
• Italy
• Spain
• Netherlands
• Turkey
• Singapore
• Saudi Arabia
• Sweden
• Poland
• United Kingdom
• European Union
• United Arab Emirates

Once you’ve obtained a trademark registration, you may apply for the registry.

To qualify for Brand Registry enrollment, your registered trademarks must be acknowledged by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or international equivalents. Approval unlocks improved brand visibility on Amazon product pages and a more effective reputation management strategy, thus potentially boosting sales for registered brands. Moreover, the program aids in product authentication and building customer trust, placing your brand in line with Amazon's top-class brand positioning.

How do I obtain a trademark registration?

Applying for an E-Commerce Trademark:

Obtaining a trademark begins with filing an application. Lloyd & Mousilli specializes in intellectual property and can assist you with the trademark application process from start to finish. We will guide you through the process of crafting a goods and services description and selecting appropriate evidence of use. Additionally, our seasoned attorneys are well equipped to advise you on overall IP strategy.

Click here to book a free strategy session with a member of our trademark team.

Can I join Amazon's Brand Registry if my application is pending?

There is a loophole that allows some sellers to apply to Amazon’s Brand Registry even if their trademark is not officially registered yet. Sellers in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and India are eligible to apply to the registry while their trademark is pending in the application/examination phase. This is especially advantageous considering the registration process is currently averaging 8 to 12 months for United States applicants.

If you are in one of the above mentioned countries, your brand is eligible to apply to the registry as soon as your trademark application is pending.

Benefits of Amazon Brand Registry

Want to protect your brand and boost sales on Amazon.com and other Amazon Marketplaces? The Amazon Brand Registry empowers sellers with tools for brand protection, enhanced content, and powerful marketing opportunities.

By enrolling, you establish a Brand Registry account and gain access to tools that safeguard your brand identity. Combat counterfeit products, maintain an excellent Amazon reputation, and ensure that products customers find on Amazon product pages – including your own multi-page store – are authentic.

Amazon Brand Registry unlocks a range of benefits for Brand Owners, including:

• Enhanced Brand Protection: Fight back against patent infringements and unauthorized resellers. Utilize the Amazon Authenticity program, safeguard your product listing, and build customer loyalty. Active Amazon sellers know that the Brand Registry helps ensure customers find authentic items, not fakes.
• Boost Sales with Increased Visibility: Optimize your Amazon product listings with rich content and enhanced visuals. Attract new-to-brand customers with your own Brand Store, improve your brand positioning in Amazon Search results, and drive traffic to your online storefront.
• Powerful Marketing Features: Access exclusive tools like Amazon Brand Analytics to run reports, understand shopping trends, and know your customers better. Leverage Display Ads, Amazon Attribution (to track off-Amazon ads), and Sponsored Brands Ads to reach more shoppers. The Brand Registry helps you take control of your marketing channels.
• Dedicated Brand Registry Support: Get help from Amazon experts to navigate the platform, address any issues, and make the most of your Brand Registry benefits. They can also help you understand sales trends better.

Features of Amazon Brand Registry

The Amazon Brand Registry provides sellers with access to a powerful suite of tools and reports to manage brand identity and drive growth as a vendor:

• Brand Registry Portal: Your central hub to access exclusive tools, report infringements, manage your brand registry data, and track performance across all country-based Amazon stores. It’s also where you’ll manage multiple brand registry accounts if you have them.
• Amazon Brand Analytics: Gain insights into customer searches, get a deeper understanding of competitor products, and analyze your brand's key performance metrics. You'll get closer to knowing what customers are searching for before they make a purchase.
• Reporting Tools: Monitor your product sales, track brand performance through the main Brand Dashboard, and receive valuable customer feedback. This all contributes to better reputation management.
• Additional Features: Benefit from the Amazon Transparency Program to maintain your seller reputation. Use Product Serialization – assigning a unique code to each product – to protect against counterfeits. Leverage the Amazon Attribution console for more effective ad campaigns and targeting.

Common Challenges in the Brand Registry Process

Navigating the Amazon Brand Registry process can present challenges for a new seller. Here are some common hurdles and how to overcome them:

• Trademark Issues: Amazon Brand Approval requires a full trademark certificate from a source like the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Understand their trademark registration requirements, get your utility patent or copyright from the United States Patent and Trademark office, and ensure your trademarks are correctly registered before you apply. A thorough, informed trademark search through the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) database can help you avoid trademark disputes before you even apply. While you can go it alone, the experience and nuance of an attorney can help you avoid pitfalls.
• Application Rejections: Incomplete brand registry applications or trademark issues can lead to rejections. Thoroughly review Amazon policies and seek Brand Registry help from Amazon Support if needed.

Best Practices for Maintaining Brand Registry

To make the most of your Brand Registry membership:

• Regularly Update Brand Information: Keep your Brand Page, product listings (including Amazon Product Detail Pages), and brand name information up-to-date and accurate. An attractive brand page will catch the eye of Amazon customers. Respond to Amazon reviews and customer feedback. This ensures a good shopping experience and strengthens your brand's presence.
• Monitoring and Addressing Infringements: Use the tools provided by the Brand Registry to monitor your Amazon Store for unauthorized sellers and counterfeit products. Be proactive in protecting your intellectual property.
• Engage with Amazon Support: Utilize the resources available through the Amazon Transparency program, the Amazon Vine program, and don't be afraid to contact Amazon Support with questions or to report infringements. They offer several brand registry benefits and can provide the ultimate guide to Amazon success.

As a vendor, manufacturer, or brand, by following these best practices, you can effectively increase brand awareness and protect your intellectual property, which includes trademarks, copyrights and brand names. This will lead to greater brand recognition while you enhance brand visibility and drive sales on Amazon and other marketplaces.

How Lloyd & Mousilli Can Assist with Brand Protection in E-Commerce

The Amazon Brand Registry enhances your brand presence. Amazon business owners like yourself can skillfully navigate marketing channels knowing your vital intellectual property has the foundation of Amazon safeguards.

Protecting your intellectual property is critical to maintaining your brand's identity. Our experienced counsel can guide you through the trademark application process to ensure you have the greatest likelihood of achieving registration. We are well-versed in the Amazon Brand Registry process and are ready to help you claim your place on the registry.

Geoffrey the Giraffe is casting an ominous shadow over one Texas family.

Last summer, almost immediately following the news that Toys “R” Us and Macy’s were teaming up to relaunch the iconic toy store in the U.S., The Toy Book reported on a detour from that forward movement as Tru Kids Brands Inc. — the WHP Global-owned parent of the Toys “R” Us and Babies “R” Us brands — took a step backward and filed a lawsuit against an independent toy store in New Jersey.

At the time, Tru Kids alleged “trademark infringement” as the store, Toys & Beyond, had moved into the space that was previously occupied by one of the two, short-lived Toys “R” Us concept stores that opened in partnership with b8ta in 2019. At the center of the complaint were issues regarding the colorful logo of Toys & Beyond and the reuse of fixtures and signage, including Geoffrey’s Treehouse, Geoffrey’s Magical Mirror, and the Play Around Theater, that were left behind when Toys “R” Us abandoned the space at the Westfield Garden State Plaza in January 2021.

On Oct. 25, 2021, The Toy Book was first alerted to a nearly identical lawsuit filed in Texas against TOYZ, a family-owned toy store that opened nearly 20 years ago. Farida Afzal immigrated to Houston from Pakistan and built a business that eventually grew to include a distribution arm and several retail stores, including a small location on the lower level of Simon Property Group’s Galleria Mall.

In its response to the complaint filed by attorneys at Baker Botts on behalf of Tru Kids Brands, Afzal Ali Enterprises, Inc. dba TOYZ noted that its store peacefully co-existed with Toys “R” Us during the time that both stores were open in the Galleria. According to the response, the scuffle began months after Toys “R” Us closed, when the Galleria landlord offered TOYZ the opportunity to expand into the former Toys “R” Us store.

Nearly a year later, the legal battle continues and it’s begun making headlines as The Houston Chronicle, alongside ABC and CBS affiliates have reported on the story. Meanwhile, a Change.org petition is calling upon WHP Global and Tru Kids Brands to drop the lawsuit, while members of the U.S. and global toy communities, including Richard Derr of Learning Express, MGA Entertainment Founder and CEO Isaac Larian, Toy World Publisher John Baulch, World Alive Founder Amy Holden, and Michael Olafsson of Monkey Fish Toys have taken to LinkedIn to express support for the owners of TOYZ and call for an end to what appears to be legal bullying in a “bleed them dry” campaign.

In Texas, it appears that Judge Charles Eskridge might agree.

On August 23, Judge Eskridge issued a scathing order against Tru Kids Brands and Toys “R” Us.

In the filing, Judge Eskridge denies a motion by Tru Kids to amend its complaint against TOYZ, stating that “the motion itself evinces undue delay and dilatory motive,” and that “the motion could also be considered abusive.”

“Toys ‘R’ Us is trying to shutter a family-owned toy store in an attempt to set a precedent for shutting down any toy store in the country that has a multi-colored logo,” Lema Barazi, lead attorney representing TOYZ for Lloyd & Mousilli tells The Toy Book. “We must — and I am confident that we will — prevail against Toys ‘R’ Us in its malicious tactics of burying small businesses in protracted litigation based on frivolous and overreaching trademark claims.”

And the tactics being used by Tru Kids brands are under scrutiny by the court itself.

Judge Eskridge says in his order that “substantial question exists regarding whether Tru Kids has initiated this action primarily for the purpose of harassing or maliciously injuring a competitor, and whether it is using the law’s procedures only for legitimate purposes.”

Tru Kids Brands was ordered “to provide by Sept. 13, 2022, an iteration of all actions it has initiated against any defendant worldwide since acquiring its interest in the Toys ‘R’ Us brand in January 2019, wherein it has alleged claims, as here, of trademark and trade-dress infringement, trademark dilution, unfair competition, or unjust enrichment relating to Toys ‘R’ Us intellectual property,” Judge Eskridge declared.

Attorneys for Tru Kids Brands did file documents to meet the Sept. 13 deadline but they did so in a sealed filing. Ahead of the deadline, The Toy Book reached out to WHP Global/Tru Kids Brands on Sept. 12, but the company did not respond to a request for comment.

While the legal dance continues to play out in court, Toys “R” Us is continuing to open its new store-within-a-store concepts in every Macy’s store ahead of an Oct. 15 completion date. Both the Galleria in Houston and the Westfield Garden State Plaza in New Jersey have Macy’s stores that are set to include Toys “R” Us departments.

Although Toys & Beyond closed its store in New Jersey, the space is currently occupied by yet another toy store: CAMP.

‍

What is a service mark?

A trademark is essentially a brand name. It’s a word, phrase, symbol, and/or design that distinguishes the source of goods of one party from another. A service mark is any word, name, symbol, device, or any combination, used (or intended to be used) in commerce to identify and distinguish the services of one provider from the services provided by others, and to indicate the source of the services.

At what point should a company register a trademark?

It depends on a myriad of factors, but a lot of businesses will trademark and incorporate simultaneously. It’s advisable to trademarkat least your name and logo in order to prevent others from ripping off your company and be provided a legal recourse if this ever happens.

Is my trademark protected even if I don’t register it with the USPTO?

Although common law trademark rights exist, it takes a lot more time and effort to prove your rights. Also, common law rights only extend to the geographic area your business is in, rather than being protected throughout the entire country if you register it with the USPTO.

When does the USPTO deny trademark applications?

Applications are routinely rejected based on the “likelihood of confusion” standard. According to the USPTO, “likelihood of confusion exists between trademarks when the marks are so similar and the goods and/or services for which they are used are so related that consumers would mistakenly believe they come from the same source. Each application is decided on its own facts, and no strict mechanical test exists for determining the likelihood of confusion.” As you can see, there is no bright-line rule to follow. That’s why utilizing an attorney experienced with the USPTO makes sense.

How long does it take to register a trademark?

The total time for an application to be processed may be anywhere from almost a year to several years, depending on the basis for filing, and the legal issues which can take place during the examination of the application. For an in-depth discussion of the time frame, read Understanding the USPTO Trademark Timeline and Examination Process.

We will discuss the different types of objects that can be protected, with specific examples, and highlight the contrasts between trademarks and copyrights

Trademark

One of the essential functions of a trademark is to allow a consumer to identify a particular source for a product or service. The same way when you see the Golden Arches as you're driving down a highway, you know that you can expect a particular meal that includes hamburgers.

Trademarks protect “source identifiers” of goods and services, this includes:

• Names of companies (Apple, Google, Amazon)
• Names of product lines (MacBook, iPhone, Camry, Jeep Wrangler)
• Names of distinctive individual products (Oreos, Nike)
• Names of book, movie, and other creative media series (Seinfeld,
• Game of Thrones, Harry Potter, Star Wars
• Non-functional forms of products (Wax seal on Maker’s Mark whiskey, sprig of mint on a Mint Mojito at Philz Coffee)
• Logos of all kinds (swoosh mark for Nike, mermaid for Starbucks, three stripes for Adidas)
• Slogans of all kinds (Just Do It, Think Different)

Trademarks do not protect:

• The content, story, writing, and plot of books, movies, and other creative media
• Designs
• Special methods by which goods are manufactured or services are provided
• The unique function of inventions

Trademark rights come in two basic varieties, common law rights, and rights stemming from a trademark registration. Common law rights come from simply using the word or words in commerce to identify a given set of goods and services, but are limited to a particular geographic scope of the business market. So, say someone is selling clothing under the trademark Mousilli Mops, and can establish that they have had continuous sales in 20 states. They may have developed common law trademark rights to Mousilli Mops in those states, even if they never filed anything with the USPTO or with their Secretary of State's office in the 20 states, at least on paper.The problem with common law rights is that they are only as good as your ability to enforce them, which means that in practice you need to have a lot of evidence of ongoing sales in the states in question, as well as constant supply of money to pay attorneys to enforce your rights. For this reason, federal registrations are practically a no-brainer for people serious about protecting their brands. They also provide protection throughout the entire country, rather than just the states or markets where you had a continuous presence and market.In fact, rights from a federal registration are what most people think of when they think of having a trademark as these rights tend to be much easier to enforce both in court, and out. Pointing an opposing party a valid Principal Register trademark registration tends to diffuse the vast majority of disputes before they ever get even close to a court proceeding, saving a lot of time and money. Especially once you have put a potential infringer on notice of their infringement.A federal trademark registration creates a presumption of the trademark holder’s exclusive rights in the trademark. This places the burden of proof on the other party, to attempt to overcome the presumption. This means that if you hold a trademark registration, the burden is not on you to prove that you have rights in the mark as would be the case with common law rights, but it is on the opposing party to prove that you do not. Because this is usually a very difficult burden to meet, these trademark rights are typically considered very strong.

Copyright

Copyright is protection for the expression of an idea as captured in a recorded form. This is what is typically sought after for creative expressions of art, music, books, and film.

Copyrights do protect the content of creative works laid down in some physical medium, this includes:

• Printed books, brochures, pamphlets, poems, documents, etc.
• Recorded films
• Recorded music
• Board games, card games, tabletop roleplaying games and their attendant rules sheets, rulebooks, etc.
• Paintings, drawings, sculptures, and other physical pieces of art
• Software source code
• Unique interfaces or designs (though not the functional elements)

Copyrights do not protect:

• Special methods by which goods are manufactured or services are provided
• The unique function of inventions
• Any performance that is not recorded
• Generic expressions of data (phone book, contact lists, etc.)
• Anything listed as protected by trademark

Copyright technically exists for the author as soon as a copyright eligible work is recorded, so, as soon as a book is written, movie is filmed, or painting is painted. That said, as with common law trademark rights, unregistered copyright is not very strong and doesn't provide a lot of easy remedies for infringement.The remedy for dealing with infringement of copyright in the United States are to file a DMCA takedown notice. This is considerably easier if you have a Copyright Office registration that you can cite in your complaint.If you want to have the ability to sue (and credibly threaten to sue) infringers for damages, you will need a federal copyright registration. As with trademarks, the greatest practical advantage of a registration is not that it gives you better chances in court, but it is the threat of being able to sue infringers for money damages is likely to keep you out of court, as most infringers do not want the very costly uphill battle of fighting a federal registration.Especially since once an infringer is put on notice, statutory damages for copyright infringement are up to $150,000 per instance.

Every time you’ve installed a piece of commercial software, you’ve invariably been presented with what must have appeared to be legal gibberish- a seeming difficult to read, needlessly long, solid block of text that was almost impossible to understand. Most people never bother to read the information presented- quickly scrolling to the bottom of the page, checking a box, clicking on “I Agree” or doing whatever it takes to get past this legal hurdle to access the software.

Despite the relative ease with which these legal terms are bypassed, or the wide range of names they are called (e.g., Terms of Use, Terms and Conditions, T&Cs, Terms of Service, End User License Agreement, EULA, etc.) these terms contain critical contractual language limiting your rights as a user of the software or service and granting rights to the use of your information and data to the software publisher, among a host of other conditions and limitations.

Terms of Use are your Playground Rules, placing users on notice upon entering your playground.

While this may seem like a nefarious or underhanded practice to take advantage of unwitting users, it is actually business critical for the software publisher to be able to prevent abuse of the software or service by malicious users, hackers, or even competitors. These terms also limit the liability for the business for claims that may be filed by the user of the software in ways that the business could never have anticipated.

Just as every business has different requirements that vary by size, industry, and region, software terms are not one size fits all, and should be customized to meet the specific service offering, secure the rights required, and mitigate the associated risks unique to the business model.

Playground Rules

As the business providing the software or services being offered, you are setting the “Playground Rules.” Your Terms of Use are your Playground Rules, placing users on notice upon entering your playground

Within the Terms of Use, you can spell out exactly what activities are prohibited on your website or platform. You can create a laundry list of prohibited practices, anything from use of profanity, multiple accounts, harassment of other users, etc. There are way too many terms that could be potentially included here to be discussed in detail, but it is sufficient to know that a social media platform would have very different terms from a personal finance management application.

At a minimum, it should allow your business to stop abusive users, terminate access or accounts at your sole discretion, and enforce restrictions and guidelines that you spell out in the Terms of Use. Users must follow your terms to access, use, and interact with your software or service.

Limiting Your Exposure

No matter how long you’ve been in business, users invariably find a way of surprising you with a confounding use of your software that you may never have anticipated. It’s baffling how these corner use cases often become the most litigious in their demands or claims when your software fails to continue meeting their needs.

A potential scenario follows. Your small business lead platform quietly becomes the default CRM for a statewide real estate agency that can no longer access closing contracts when your servers are offline for unscheduled maintenance. All of their real estate closings have to be rescheduled, loan rates are no longer valid, and the buyers are looking for blood.

While this may seem unreasonable in reliance, your terms of use can also limit the liability for your business for claims that may be filed by the user of the software in ways that the business could never have anticipated. A limitation of liability clause can easily set the maximum exposure for your business to the license fees paid by the user.

Your State, Your Laws

While electronic distribution over the internet or app stores lets you distribute your software offering far and wide, the last thing that you want for your business is to be dragged into court in some unfamiliar jurisdiction, with unanticipated state or country laws you are now subject to.  You may strategically use your Terms of Use to contractually set out venue requirement in your home state and country and designate the governing law to be used in the event of a legal issue arising.

It may also be preferable for your business to require arbitration proceedings for any legal issue that arises with your users, rather than allow for litigation, as a cost saving measure.

Rights, Rights, Baby

For many software and service offerings, the information received from users (i.e., photos, written content, reviews, purchase transactions, behavioral tracking, and other data) serves as an essential element of your value proposition. But have you properly secured the right to the use of this information? For creative material, the copyright vests in the author and you will need to ensure you have been granted the right to the use of this material. Your Terms of Use is the vehicle to obtain a license to the use of any intellectual property that a user provides on your platform.

Terms of Use can allow a license to any IP a user provides on your platform.

Oftentimes, platforms with user-generated content tend to allow users to retain ownership to their content, but take a very broad license for the use of the material. This heavy-handed approach can cause customer satisfaction issues, as evidenced by the backlash Facebook and other content sharing sites have experienced when they expanded their rights to the user content. This license needs to be crafted for your specific business requirements to secure the rights you legitimately need to fulfill your platform objectives.

This information collection also raises the issue of privacy rights that is a topic in its own right and addressed in a separate article covering the usage of Privacy Policies.

User Generated Headaches

Many platforms allow for users to create content that is visible to other users on the platform or publicly. Often times this user generated content includes the ability for users to upload photos, audio, or video to make the content more engaging and attractive. The viral user video that got all the press for your platform? Turns out it included clips from Game of Thrones and HBO isn’t happy about the copyright infringement.

DMCA can provide a defense against user copyright infringement liability

Fortunately, you can provide a defense for your business from copyright violations your users may create by virtue of complying with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”). The DMCA helps protect businesses and apps from having legal liability for any copyright infringement that takes place due to the actions of its users, if they follow the procedures required. While the DMCA is a United States law, other countries around the world have laws regarding copyright infringement.

In order to comply with the requirements of the DMCA defense to infringement, your Terms of Use need to include (a) clause that states you will take down/remove any material that turns out to be copyrighted if the violation is brought to your attention, (b) provide a method by which the third-party copyright owner can report a copyright violation, and (c) have a policy in place for responding to take down notices for violating material reported.

Unlawful Content

In addition to the copyright issues from user generated content, your business can still run afoul of content considered unlawful in any number of jurisdictions around the world. Many jurisdictions worldwide have laws restricting material that is considered hate speech, inflammatory, child pornography, graphic violence, depictions of abuse, and other material considered unlawful content. These interpretations vary widely in their scope and breadth.

Your Terms of Use can address this issue through a relatively straightforward clause restricting any unlawful content and stating your policy of removal of any such offending content upon review.

Summary

Hopefully, you have developed an appreciation for the benefits and risk mitigation measures springing from having a comprehensive Terms of Use tailored to your specific business requirements.

While not required by law, we firmly believe one of the greatest benefits to having an effective Terms of Use for your business is the intangible one from having clarity of your users on their expectations and responsibilities in using your software and services and will pay dividends in customer satisfaction. See Lloyd & Mousilli's Terms  for a sample.

We stand ready to review your business needs and help you achieve your business objectives in consultation with your lawyer at Lloyd & Mousilli.

E-commerce has fundamentally transformed the retail marketplace and has changed the way consumers shop. Fast and inexpensive shipping, the convenience of being able to shop at any time of day from anywhere, and the ability to quickly compare prices online— added to the convenience of avoiding long lines and traffic— makes e-commerce appealing to virtually every shopper. Unsurprisingly, e-commerce sales account for a significant and continuously growing percentage of total retail sales in the U.S.

Among the various e-commerce platforms available, Amazon leads all others in sales by a comfortable margin and is the highest-grossing online retailer in the nation. On the Amazon website, customers can purchase products sold directly by Amazon and those available on Amazon’s marketplace sold by a third-party seller. Amazon’s e-commerce platform has allowed third-party sellers to reach a far wider consumer audience— estimated at over 300 million active customers— than was ever possible before. Hundreds of thousands of small and medium-sized businesses sell on Amazon and the number of sellers in the United States and around the world continues to grow every day. In fact, Amazon has emerged as one of the most powerful distribution channels in the world.

Given the ease of selling on Amazon’s e-commerce platform, the relative anonymity sellers have, and its massive global audience, there is little wonder why the shadowy business of counterfeit goods has found its way to Amazon. After all, the world of counterfeits is a massive, sprawling   industry.  According to a 2019  Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development report, international trade for counterfeit goods reached $509 billion in 2016. In the U.S., counterfeits are estimated to cost the economy $30 billion to $40 billion annually by diverting sales away from purchases of legitimate products. The top industries affected by counterfeits include footwear, luxury handbags, electrical machinery and equipment, and watches. Given the significant amount of lost revenue counterfeit goods siphon from their authentic counter-parts, it is little wonder why counterfeits are considered a serious threat to companies and their brand.

As recent court decisions indicate, Amazon and other similar third-party marketplaces are not liable for selling counterfeit products on their sites largely because they are a platform for sellers rather than sellers themselves. In Milo & Gabby LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc., for example, the   Federal Circuit held that Amazon’s activities, which included providing an   online marketplace and shipping services to third-party vendors selling products that allegedly infringed the plaintiff’s copyrighted products, did not create seller liability for the purposes of copyright infringement. See Milo & Gabby LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc., 693 F. App'x 879 (Fed. Cir. 2017).

While Amazon and other third-party marketplaces have no legal duty to police counterfeit listings and they are not legally obligated to proactively remove suspected counterfeits from their platform, they will apply a take down procedure and quickly remove the product listing from their website when a complaint is properly filed. Consequently, right holders must take responsibility for their own intellectual property enforcement.

Unfortunately, at times, right holders improperly abuse Amazon’s take down procedure by wrongfully filing complaints— including trademark and patent infringement claims— against legitimate sellers. For example, right holders often misunderstand their rights under U.S. intellectual property law and attempt to overreach by filing illegitimate complaints against resellers of their brand. Once a complaint is filed— whether or not the complainant is on the right side of the law— Amazon will deactivate or suspend the seller’s account until an investigation is completed. Investigations are protracted events that are seldomly resolved quickly, much to a seller’s disadvantage since a suspended account for a seller means lost revenue every moment of the suspension.

Sellers are frequently eager to reinstate their account quickly but often find difficulty navigating Amazon’s complex rules for reinstatement. Faced with complaints from a powerful brand holder, sellers often give up the fight, unaware that the brand holder is on the wrong side of the law. When this occurs, a formal demand for the brand holder to cease and desist is in order. The demand letter should cite pertinent U.S. intellectual property statutes and caselaw to support the seller's position and should instruct the brand owner to retract all complaints immediately. A working knowledge of basic U.S. intellectual property law and practical negotiation skills are usually all that are needed for relatively quick closure to these disputes.

The world of e-commerce is constantly evolving and it has become increasingly more complex and sophisticated. In order to stay in business and remain competitive, sellers can no longer remain ignorant of U.S. intellectual property law. Savvy sellers can protect their brand and/or fend off unwarranted take downs by becoming informed and utilizing the law to their advantage.

Scale of Diffusion Within AI-Related Patent Applications

The AI algorithm’s findings confirmed the general hypothesis that inventors across various technological fields are increasingly filing AI-related patent applications. AI-related patents within the AI-based hardware, vision, machine-learning, natural language processing(NLP), speech, and evolutionary computation fields are increasing, both in number and as a percentage of the total patents filed each year. Additionally, the sophisticated and complex hardware necessary to support the growing integration of AI into these new innovations is directly contributing to the increase of applications for AI hardware patents. According to data presented by AltIndex.com, “back in 2014, there were roughly 30,800 active patent families of the global top 100 owners in the AI tech space. Since then, the total number of active patent families in the AI tech field surged by 940% in the past ten years and hit nearly 320,000.”

AI-related innovation is even being diffused within these large corporations themselves as they are finding more ways to implement AI systems specific to the various product lines, departments, and the many industries with which these corporations engage. Looking at the sheer volume of AI-related patents owned by the top players back in 2020 when the USPTO conducted its study, we see IBM (46,752), Microsoft (22,067) and Google (10,928), at the top, although these numbers have only increased since. This is a clear indication of just how integral and influential these companies view AI technology as being a major factor to their future success. While these larger players are still dominating the AI-related patent space, there is a growing trend of AI-related technology diffusing into small businesses, startups, and even individual inventors. Additional evidence of AI’s significant growth beyond just its initial niche users is the geographical diversity in patent applications. For example, several states in the Midwest have acquired AI-related patents as a part of larger image recognition and data processing technologies created to provide medical care in rural areas. This indicates the shift of accessibility to AI technology that previously saw it limited to geographical areas that were heavy producers of technology, such as Silicon Valley and Austin, Texas.

Impact on Startups & Inventors

Previously, AI was seen as accessible only by larger corporations and as exorbitantly expensive, as evidenced by the number of AI-related patents held by the traditional technology giants. This is no longer the case as AI is permeating every industry and facet of business, in that 82% of business leaders have already deployed generative AI or are intending to deploy it within the next year.  Small businesses and inventors should be mindful of the changing landscape and reflect on how AI could impact their ideas, inventions, and their industry as a whole. AI typically serves to either advance or enhance technology. Often in order to secure early-stage funding, build a successful product, and eventually exit the startup stage, an innovator would need to produce a good business plan. Within that plan, it would be wise to show a clear understanding and strategy for how any AI-related technology or patents would advance or enhance the businesses’ success. Integrating AI into an invention is one way to ensure that investors know the inventor has considered such alternatives and is planning for the future. Even companies with well-established products that currently do not rely on AI must consider the future impact of AI technology on their products and industry to avoid being left behind.

Caution: Do Not Place the Proverbial Cart Before the Patent Horse

Inventors are understandably excited about their new invention; they often feel as though they have just created the greatest thing since sliced bread and the world needs to know about this wonderful new invention right away. While their enthusiasm may be warranted, it comes with a great deal of risk. Without the robust protection that a patent offers, or even the protection a patent application offers, the invention maybe in jeopardy of being stolen or declared ineligible for patentability if the inventor fails to file an application in time. The business side of monetizing an invention can often be a tricky aspect of innovation. Businesses and innovators, be advised, always apply for the maximum patent protection that the invention is eligible for at any given time. This means considering alternative embodiments, uses, technologies, and other factors that may affect the invention now or in the future. It is important to file for patent protection prior to commercialization of the invention. The risk of working toward commercialization without a patent can be extremely risky. Furthermore, if a larger company is looking to acquire or contract with a newer startup, they often require the startup to secure all of the appropriate protection for its intellectual property, especially any patentable inventions, prior to any transaction taking place. Startups can streamline any future acquisition or licensing of their products by filing a provisional patent application to ensure protection for each novel component of their product.

Filing a patent application, or in some cases, a series of patent applications, is a highly complex and detailed process that requires attorneys with both a thorough understanding of the technology involved and the legal know-how to ensure the invention is granted the broadest protection available. A patent attorney will often conduct a prior art search (looking for known or potentially conflicting technologies), draft and amend the patent application (ensuring the broadest language and coverage possible for the invention), and lobby on the inventor’s behalf by responding to and working through any issues raised by a patent examiner at the USPTO. Integrating an AI-related technology into a patent application can make the already bizarre claim language even more complicated to navigate and adds an additional wrinkle into the complexity. This is why it is best to seek the help of a seasoned patent attorney that can efficiently and effectively articulate the underlying algorithm and technology in a manner that satisfies the USPTO’s statutory requirements for patentability.

Lloyd & Mousilli boasts a team of experts in the area of AI-related patents. Let us employ our extensive experience helping early-stage innovators to receive the fullest patent protection over the novel idea at the earliest date to ensure priority. We have overseen patent strategies for consumer products at some of the largest technology companies and want to share this experience with you. The different teams at our firm, led by seasoned attorneys, work in synergy to help businesses seamlessly weave their patents throughout their broader business strategy. We will ensure that any equity agreements, assignment rights, employment agreements, non-disclosures and all other relevant documents accurately reflect the scope and rights regarding your innovations. Our goal at Lloyd & Mousilli is to help clients accomplish their long-term goals by working closely with them at each stage and tailoring our advice in accordance with the client’s aspirations and needs.

If you are in need of legal assistance, reach out and consult with the Lloyd & Mousilli startup legal team or set-up a free consultation through our website for questions about AI-related patents or any of your patent needs.